The mtDNA frequency analysis presented in this report revealed close genetic association, at the mtDNA level, between TC and European Neo-Eneolithic farming groups, particularly those from central and northern Europe, including representatives of the Funnel Beaker/TRB complex such as Funnel Beakers from Scandinavia (FBC [23–27]) as well as the Baalberge (BAC) and Salzmünde (SMC) Funnel Beaker groups from central Germany (Fig 1). Like TC, the FBC group lacked representatives of hunter-gatherer lineages of haplogroup U such as U5, while the U5 component in the BAC and SMC populations comprised less than 5% of the mtDNA haplogroup variety. All three abovementioned European Funnel Beaker groups featured representatives of haplogroup H at or over 25% frequency, as well as having representatives of haplogroups J and T2b. The BAC and SMC populations also contained individuals belonging to haplogroup HV. The similarity in mtDNA lineage composition between TC and the Funnel Beaker/TRB culture complex may be a result of inter-group contacts due to the proximity of the TRB populations to the TC territory. An overlap of TC and TRB settlements has been documented to the northwest of the Verteba site, in the upper parts of the Dniester River basin and adjacent areas, and evidence of contacts between the two cultures exists in the archeological record [28]. Certain artifacts found in Verteba (clay buttons, perforated bone plates, a massive megalith inside the cave across from the cave entrance, some of these discussed in [7]) can be viewed as the influence of the Beaker cultural horizon on the Verteba cultural complex. The geographic proximity might have promoted cultural and biological contacts between TRB and Trypillian groups throughout the entire extent of the TC distribution along the Carpathian arc and reaching the western part of the NPR, thus providing the Beakers with an access to the North Pontic steppe. A recent study revealed close genetic proximity of the Eneolithic NPR as well as western NPR Yamna groups of the Early Bronze Age to the Funnel Beaker Bernburg population (3,100–2,650 BCE) from Germany [29]. There is also evidence that the contacts involving Beakers and the Pontic steppe and forest-steppe populations potentially extended further eastward into the Ponto-Caspian region during the Early Bronze Age (EBA). An mtDNA analysis of the Novosvobodnaya and Maikop cultures (3,700–3,000 BCE) from the northern foothills of the Caucasus mountain range produced mtDNA lineages of T2b and U8b1a2 [30], although displaying different polymorphism patterns compared to the T2b and U8b1a2 lineages reported for TC (this report) and ancient farming groups from central Europe. At the same time, Novosvobodnanya culture artifacts suggest a Funnel Beaker influence [31]. Additional mtDNA sampling from Novosvobodnaya, Maikop, Trypillia and the North Pontic steppe should clarify the relationship between the EBA cultures from northern Caucasus and Trypillia and their genetic connection with the Beaker cultural horizon, as well as the extent of the Beaker influence on the genetic landscape of prehistoric Ponto-Caspian region. ... Archeogenetic evidence points towards the expansion of the major sub-branches of haplogroup H such as the H1 mtDNA lineage from western Europe during the second half of the Neolithic, thus not being directly associated with the initial spread of farming in Europe, but, instead, being connected to the spread of the Beaker groups across the subcontinent [22,43]. The frequency of haplogroup H and the presence of H1 in mtDNA lineages found in TC population at Verteba further strengthen the genetic connection between TC and populations of the Beaker cultural complex.Was this an oversight? Or are we going to learn in the Bell Beaker behemoth that Bell Beakers are in fact the product of contacts between Funnel Beakers, Trypillians and North Pontic Steppe groups? Nikitin AG, Potekhina I, Rohland N, Mallick S, Reich D, Lillie M (2017) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of eneolithic trypillians from Ukraine reveals neolithic farming genetic roots. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0172952. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172952
search this blog
Friday, February 24, 2017
Trypillian mtDNA + hints of things to come?
Over at PLoS ONE there's a new paper on the maternal ancestry of Trypillian Culture (TC) farmers. It's based on just eight mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences, which, despite the authors' valiant efforts to interpret their significance, aren't especially informative. The paper's main conclusion is that, at least maternally, these farmers aren't much different from the Neolithic farmers of Anatolia and Central Europe.
But here's the interesting part: several researchers from Harvard are co-authors on this paper, and some of the sequencing was done at the Reich lab at Harvard. What this probably means is that the Reich lab has also sequenced the genome-wide and Y-chromosome data for at least some of these ancient individuals. My guess is that this data will be published in the upcoming Bell Beaker Behemoth.
Indeed, despite the small number of samples and relatively limited data, a good chunk of the paper is devoted to documented and hypothesized links between the Trypillians, Funnel Beakers, North Pontic Steppe populations and the Maikop Culture of the North Caucasus. Moreover, interestingly, the authors make no distinction at any point between Funnel Beakers and Bell Beakers; they're just referring to a single European-wide Beaker cultural complex. Emphasis is mine:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
214 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 214 of 214@Andrew
Thanks for trying to explain some basics that everyone should know here. Not that many will listen or learn, but it's nice to hear a sane summary of the situation based on the current state of our knowledge and not on fantasies.
@ Rob
"Linguist Peter Schrijver speculates on the reminiscent lexical and typological features of the region, from an unknown substrate whose linguistic influences may have influenced the historical development of the (Romance and Germanic) languages of the region. He assumes the pre-existence of pre-Indo-European languages"
And you didn't reply about Iberia".
Schrijver is a great linguist, a cathedratic, but he is also he who said that the agriculturalists from Anatolia to central Europe spoke an Hattic language, speculating about a few dubious etymologies. I wrote to him that if we should think to their language, we should rather think to Etruscan, as there is no witness of an Hattic language in Europe to-day whereas Etruscan has the close language in the Lemnos Island and may well have come to Italy from central Europe through the Alps where there were other Etruscan like languages like Rhaetian and Camun. He didn't reply to me.
@ colin
In some of beaker burials in Bohemia, some individuals interred as females turned out to be biological males. It's seems that only some males were allowed to be, or had qualified to be, as such. To a smaller degree, some females were interred as males (ie with weapons, etc).
What could have happened is Vucedol I2a which apparently looks like the majority could have spread West to Iberia maybe taking some R1b DF27 ( who adopted the Non-Indo-European part of Vucedol) with them via a maritime route.?
@ Alberto & Andrew
Basques have amongst the highest Yamnaya admixture in Iberia compared to other Iberian groups.
Enough hogwash , let get something real and talk on :
Understanding ancient human population genetics of the eastern Eurasian steppe through mitochondrial DNA analysis: Central Mongolian samples from the Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age and Mongol Empire periods
http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1868417323.html?FMT=ABS
The also found Indian Mtdna...
Maybe R1b DF27 and R1b L21 split up in the Vucedol Culture/Yamna amalgam, with DF27 becoming Non-IE taking a Maritime Route with I2a to Iberia while R1b L21 took the Northern Route and retaining more of the Yamna Cultural aspects.
@ Nirjhar007 said...
Enough hogwash , let get something real and talk on :
Understanding ancient human population genetics of the eastern Eurasian steppe through mitochondrial DNA analysis: Central Mongolian samples from the Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age and Mongol Empire periods
http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1868417323.html?FMT=ABS
Both the H2a2 and U5a1 haplotypes have coalescence dates after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (24,500-17,000BCE) (Achilli et al 2004; Malyarchuk 2004; Clark et al 2009); and both are considered to be linked with the central European Neolithic Linearbandkeramik (LBK), also known as the Linear Pottery Culture, from central Europe, and to the upper Neolithic-Eneolithic Yamnaya (Pit Grave) archaeological culture (3500-2300BCE), sometimes referred to as the “Kurgan Culture,” although these haplotypes also have been found in pre-Yamnaya cultures in western Europe (Anthony 2007; Bentley et al 2012; Brown 2014; Fowler et al 2015; Gomart et al 2015; Haak et al 2015). The Yamnaya culture is closely associated with wagon-based mobile pastoralism and the domestication of cattle (Mallory 1989; Anthony 2007). The H2 haplogroup most likely evolved in European refugia during the last glacial maximum (LGM) (~20,000BCE) (Torroni et al 2001), while the U5 haplogroup has been identified as developing in the near East or southeastern Europe during the LGM (Achilli et al 2004; Malyarchuk 2004; Haak et al 2005, 2010). The Neolithic dating of these two individuals on the Mongol Steppe could place the arrival of these lineages in concert with the Eneolithic Afanasievo archaeological culture (3700 2500BCE) found in the Altai Mountains and Minusinsk Basin (Gryaznov 1969: Svyatko et al 2013; Honeychurch 2015) (pages 46-47).
The Northwest Block included a large part of Northern Gaul, Norgh of rivers Somme and Oise, where lived (2000 years ago) the Morini, Menapii...
It is guessed by several authors (Kuhn, Gysseling and more recently Sergent) that it existed a non-Celtic substra because of some archaisms found in toponyms and anthroponyms. It is a supposition, not a verified fact. Moreover, they postulated that the substra came from a different IE language, probably extinct. Not from a non-IE language! And it is clear that most of the former NWB was celtised or germanised at the time of Caesar, probably since centuries. This is widely accepted. Not the reminiscent of a non-IE language in the Morini or Menapii populations.
@Aram - Good point, my mistake.
Davidski
"The steppe people and steppe-derived cultures in Central Europe seemed to have practiced male patrilocality/female exogamy (wait for the upcoming study on the Lach Valley in Bavaria). How does that square with the statement that most of the breding was internal?"
i think the idea is there could have been peaceful coexistence for n generations with say 1 in 20 exogamous marriages per generation and then the farmers have a population crash and the herders expand over their territory.
@Rob
"@ Alberto & Andrew
Basques have amongst the highest Yamnaya admixture in Iberia compared to other Iberian groups."
I agree. This is a true fact. It doesn't necessarily mean that they spoke IE languages. Two plausible theories could explain this: (1) people with the Yamnaya autosomal component may not have been mono-lingual (or even shared the same language family) in their homeland at the pertinent times, or (2) the ethnogenesis of the Bell Beaker culture from Yamnaya-like migrations in early male dominated migration to Iberia resulted in language shift to the language of their wives (presumably a first wave Neolithic language), followed by rapid expansion.
Also, FWIW, I suspect based on archaeology, that modern Basque country became Basque after southern Iberian Bell Beakers reached France and then then culturally descendants back migrated to Northern Spain from France. Northern Spain was a relatively late recipient of the Bell Beaker and related cultures. So, the modern Basque were probably filtered via serial founder effects.
I also suspect, notwithstanding arguments from a Basque friend that it isn't a major factor, that high levels of RH negative blood type factors probably contributed to Basque genetic exceptionalism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rh_blood_group_system
@ Andrew
"I agree. This is a true fact. It doesn't necessarily mean that they spoke IE languages. Two plausible theories could explain this: (1) people with the Yamnaya autosomal component may not have been mono-lingual (or even shared the same language family) in their homeland at the pertinent times, or (2) the ethnogenesis of the Bell Beaker culture from Yamnaya-like migrations in early male dominated migration to Iberia resulted in language shift to the language of their wives (presumably a first wave Neolithic language), followed by rapid expansion.
Also, FWIW, I suspect based on archaeology, that modern Basque country became Basque after southern Iberian Bell Beakers reached France and then then culturally descendants back migrated to Northern Spain from France. Northern Spain was a relatively late recipient of the Bell Beaker and related cultures. So, the modern Basque were probably filtered via serial founder effects."
Agreed.
Incidentally, when I played around with nMonte, the Neolithic chosen for Basque were more central European (eg Baalberg; i.e. representing something north of the Pyrenees), but I know Alberto got Iberia Chalcolithic. Perhaps the exercise is too temperamental to tell for sure.
@ Ric Hern
"What could have happened is Vucedol I2a which apparently looks like the majority could have spread West to Iberia maybe taking some R1b DF27 ( who adopted the Non-Indo-European part of Vucedol) with them via a maritime route.?"
We only have one Vucedol sample - and its R1b. The other BA Hungary samples which are mostly I2a are not Vucedol, as Vucedol isn't from Hungary, but Croatia & northern Serbia.
Still, it isn;t unlikely that there'll be some I2a there, as well as J2, old farmer lineages (G2). etc.
Acc. to Hungarian & ex-Yugoslav archaeologists, Vucedol is a fusion of original Balkan Chalcolithics and Caucasus immigrants. It looks very different to Beaker cultures, - e.g is characterised by Forts along the Drava-Sava, vast metal accumulations, etc; and such features are obviously absent in the modest little huts of Beaker folk. It began c. 3000 BC, i.e. same time as Yamnaya. But by 2500 BC, there is some convergence in pottery styules with BB, probably as Beaker communities moved south along the Danube (e.g. Csepel group).
Hopefully the BB paper will have Vucedol samples, and itll all fall into place. But the only thing worth noting (& further launching speculations about) is that BB in central Europe is preceded by CWC for some 200 - 300 years. In some areas, the transition from CWC to BB seems continuous (afterall, they were similar "Beaker cultures'), in others there was mutual exclusivity and even violence. When BB first appears in central Europe (c. 2450 BC), Yamnaya had essentialy ended, and retreated back east.
So as a last speculation, I am more inclined to think that eastern BB's were a subsection Corded Ware communities from SW Poland which had become incorporated into the (wealthier) Beaker phenomenon, and then slowly usurped the entire northern section of it by 2200 BC, surging west as far as Ireland. This would explain all L51, or at least L21 at a mimimum.
As for DF 27, i got interesting results for ATP9, a proxy for BA Iberia
Iberia_BA:ATP9
Remedello_BA:RISE489 65 %
Corded_Ware_Germany:I0104 17.5 %
Villabruna:I9030 11.1 %
Kotias:KK1 3.4 %
Hungary_N:I1495 2.3 %
But both ATP9 and Remedello are lower coverage, which could explain their 'mutual attraction'.
Yamnaya_Kalmykia:RISE552 0.65 %
Post a Comment