search this blog
Monday, November 25, 2019
Viking Age Iceland
I finally managed to get some of the Icelandic ancients from Ebenesersdóttir et al. 2018 into the Global25 datasheets (see here). Better late than never. Look for the"ISL_Viking_Age" prefix. Below is a screen cap of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with the new samples. It was done with an online Global25 PCA runner freely available here.
The individuals classified as unadmixed Gaels and Norse by Ebenesersdóttir et al. generally also look like it based on their Global25 coordinates.
The mixture models below, using all of the populations from the Global25 "modern pop averages scaled" datasheet, were run with an online tool freely available here. Note that the ADD DIST COL option is set to 1X. This is a useful feature for modeling the fine scale ancestry of samples that are derived from very similar populations.
See also...
They came, they saw, and they mixed
Commoner or elite?
Who were the people of the Nordic Bronze Age?
Labels:
ancient DNA,
Bjork,
Celtic,
Gaelic,
Gaels,
Germanic,
Global25,
I1,
Iceland,
Icelandic,
Ireland,
Norse,
Norsemen,
Northern Europe,
PCA,
R1a-Z284,
R1b-L21,
Scandinavia,
Viking Age,
Vikings
Sunday, November 10, 2019
Etruscans, Latins, Romans and others
I've just added coordinates for more than 100 ancient genomes from the recently published Antonio et al. ancient Rome paper to the Global25 datasheets. Look for the population and individual codes listed here. Same links as always:
Global25 datasheet ancient scaled Global25 pop averages ancient scaled Global25 datasheet ancient Global25 pop averages ancientThus far I've only managed to check a handful of the coordinates, so please let me know if you spot any issues. Below is a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) featuring the Etruscan and Italic speakers. I ran the PCA with an online tool specifically designed for Global25 coordinates freely available here. Can we say anything useful about the origins of the Etruscan and early Italic populations thanks to these new genomes? Also, to reiterate my question from the last blog post, what are the genetic differences exactly between the Etruscans, early Latins, Romans and present-day Italians? Feel free to let me know in the comments below. Update 13/11/2019: Here's another, similar PCA. This one, however, is based on genotype data, and it also highlights many more of the samples from the Antonio et al. paper. Considering these results, I'm tempted to say that the present-day Italian gene pool largely formed in the Iron Age, and that it was only augmented by population movements during later periods. The relevant datasheet is available here. Update 13/11/2019: It seems to me that the two Latini-associated outliers show significant ancestry from the Levant, which possibly means that they're in part of Phoenician origin. These qpAdm models speak for themselves:
ITA_Ardea_Latini_IA_o ITA_Proto-Villanovan 0.547±0.081 Levant_ISR_Ashkelon_IA2 0.453±0.081 chisq 7.573 tail prob 0.87027 Full output ITA_Prenestini_tribe_IA_o ITA_Proto-Villanovan 0.679±0.068 Levant_ISR_Ashkelon_IA2 0.321±0.068 chisq 7.222 tail prob 0.89033 Full outputThe Proto-Villanovan singleton is also a key part of the models. Dating to the Bronze Age/Iron Age transition, she appears to be of western Balkan origin. Moreover, her steppe ancestry is probably derived directly from the Yamnaya horizon.
ITA_Proto-Villanovan HRV_Vucedol 0.677±0.031 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 0.323±0.031 chisq 10.397 tail prob 0.661174 Full outputThe cluster made up of four early Italic speakers can be modeled with minor Proto-Villanovan-related ancestry, but, perhaps crucially, it doesn't need to be. Indeed, judging by the qpAdm output below, it's possible that almost all of its steppe ancestry came from the Bell Beaker complex, and, thus, the Corded Ware culture complex before that.
ITA_Italic_IA Bell_Beaker_Mittelelbe-Saale 0.480±0.055 ITA_Grotta_Continenza_CA 0.411±0.042 ITA_Proto-Villanovan 0.109±0.084 chisq 10.294 tail prob 0.590205 Full outputTwo out of the three available Etruscans look very similar to the Italic speakers in the above PCA plots, and yet they show a lot more Proto-Villanovan-related ancestry in my qpAdm run. The statistical fit is also relatively poor, perhaps suggesting that something important is missing.
ITA_Etruscan Bell_Beaker_Mittelelbe-Saale 0.186±0.081 ITA_Grotta_Continenza_CA 0.283±0.064 ITA_Proto-Villanovan 0.531±0.126 chisq 17.175 tail prob 0.143143 Full outputInterestingly, the Etruscan outlier with significant North African admixture (proxied in my run by MAR_LN) doesn't need to be modeled with any Bell Beaker ancestry.
ITA_Etruscan_o ITA_Proto-Villanovan 0.675±0.057 MAR_LN 0.325±0.057 chisq 14.864 tail prob 0.315912 Full outputUpdate 17/11/2019: The spatial maps below show how three groups of ancient Romans (from the Imperial, Late Antiquity and Medieval periods) compare to present-day West Eurasian populations in terms of their Global25 coordinates. The hotter the color, the higher the similarity. More here. See also... Getting the most out of the Global25
Labels:
admixture,
ancient DNA,
Ancient Greece,
Ancient Rome,
archaeogenetics,
Etruscans,
Global25,
Italic,
Italy,
Latin,
Levant,
Mediterranean,
Middle East,
North Africa,
Pontic-Caspian steppe,
Roman Empire,
Southern Europe
Thursday, November 7, 2019
What's the difference between ancient Romans and present-day Italians?
The first paper on the genomics of ancient Romans was finally published today at Science [LINK]. It's behind a paywall, but the supplementary info is freely available here. Below is a quick summary of the results courtesy of the accompanying Ancient Rome Data Explorer.
I'm told that the genotype data from the paper will be online within a day or so at the Pritchard Lab website here. I'll have a lot more to say about ancient Romans and present-day Italians after I get my hands on it.
See also...
Etruscans, Latins, Romans and others
Labels:
admixture,
ancient DNA,
Ancient Greece,
Ancient Rome,
archaeogenetics,
Etruscans,
Italian,
Italic,
Italy,
Latin,
Levant,
Mediterranean,
Middle East,
North Africa,
Pontic-Caspian steppe,
Roman Empire,
Southern Europe
Tuesday, November 5, 2019
Modeling your ancestry has never been easier
An exceedingly simple, yet feature-packed, online tool ideal for modeling ancestry with Global25 coordinates is freely available HERE. It works offline too, after downloading the web page onto your computer. Just copy paste the coordinates of your choice under the "source" and "target" tabs, and then mess around with the buttons to see what happens. The screen caps below show me doing just that.
Another free, easy to use online tool that works with Global25 coordinates is the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) runner HERE. Below is a screen cap of me checking out one of the many PCA that it offers.
See also...
Getting the most out of the Global25
Saturday, November 2, 2019
Interesting times ahead
The map below made a big impression on me. Can't wait to see all of these ancient samples online. More details here.
See also...
Is Yamnaya overrated?
Y-haplogroup R1a and mental health
Getting the most out of the Global25
Labels:
ancient DNA,
archaeogenetics,
archeology,
Britain,
Central Asia,
Eurasia,
Eurasian steppe,
Europe,
global genetic variation,
HIV,
Iberia,
Indo-European,
Pontic-Caspian steppe,
Proto-Indo-European
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)