Steppe Ancestry in western Eurasia and the spread of the Germanic Languages (McColl et al.) The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans (Lazaridis et al.) A genomic history of the North Pontic Region from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age (Nikitin et al.)All of these studies are very useful, but there are some problems with each of them. Indeed, I'd say that the authors of the Lazaridis and McColl preprints need to reevaluate the way that they use ancient DNA to solve their linguistic puzzles. Once they do that their conclusions are likely to change significantly. I'm aiming to produce a couple of detailed blog posts about these preprints within the next few weeks. Afterwards I'll get in touch with the relevant authors to change their minds about some key things. Please stay tuned. See also... Indo-European crackpottery
Friday, April 19, 2024
It's complicated
Three important manuscripts appeared recently at bioRxiv, mostly dealing with the origins and expansions of proto-Germanic and proto-Indo-European populations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1,378 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1201 – 1378 of 1378Regarding this talk of R1b and Turkic connections,
R-M73 clades show up in various Scythian (and thus IE speaking) populations, including eastern Scythians which happen to be a significant source of Y-DNA for turkic peoples. There also is Hunnic period sample DA92 with nearly 30% WSHG-related ancestry who had this lineage, so perhaps some peripheral Siberian people of this time period had this clade as well, but its also possible that this individual had excessive siberian ancestry but had a Scythian paternal line.
Suggesting a "strong connection" between R-BY14355 and the Turkic peoples is odd to me, when we literally track the assimilation of this clade into Turkic speaking communities in the ancient DNA record. We see it in the Tarim Basin first with the Xiaohe-Gumugou peoples and their R-FTB1 clade, with a relative clade in bronze age SCA. The main clade R-PH155 shows up in the Tarim Basin (Zaghunluq) and eastern Xinjiang (Shirenzigou) first, then during the Xiongnu period we see it amongst people with this Xinjiang/Eastern steppe mixed profile as well as individuals with more significant eastern ancestry. Pretty easy to figure out what happened here.
If you look into the data from relevant time periods it should be clear that the clades of importance for Early Turks are C-Y10420 and N-M2019, not R1b clades from vulture eating ANE desert dwellers or iron age populations west of the Khangai mountains.
@Kevin Brook
Your response was interesting and I'm glad we came to a general agreement. I should say that I am not saying that Poles who show, lets say (and this is being liberal, very liberal) 1.4% Ashkenazi ancestry are just misreads. Usually these are cases below 1%. The actual comment was in response to Steven and Davidski's conversation on a blog claiming 'Poles get 0.8% Ashkenazi on modern DNA tests which means they all by in-large have Ashkenazic ancestry'. Naturally this is a dubious claim and no study has ever found anything like this either.
In regards to records I am aware of the Frankists. However, there is a reason I did not mention them. They were not a large enough population to alter the Polish genome in any reasonably amount of time and we cannot easily track these converts. They were not a common group of people and were seen as heretics by most Jews.
The number of estimated Frankist converts at their peak was estimated at 50,000 and many seemed to have been around urban areas such as Warsaw and previously Lwów. Where they all went, if some re-converted, who left descendants all becomes problematic and their numbers were just too small to do any real impact in such a short period of time with various possible barriers. It should also be stated that the Frankist movement was elitist in nature and was mostly sought by middle-upper class Jews. These can naturally cause divisions and breeding biases to consider. I have no doubt some did leave descendants in Poland and Ukraine, however not enough to explain the, albeit rare minor Ashkenazic ancestry some Poles today have. It's grasping at straws slightly.
This is therefor why I stated most Jewish-Gentile intermarriages occurred in the middle of the 19th century as Poland began rapidly industrializing. The Frankists were simply too fringe and small to do any real impact and we're working with overtly specific individuals to explain the, although extremely rare current Ashkenazi ancestry in some Poles today.
@Noble Goth and @Davidski
Well it seems this isn’t too uncommon, at least based on the results posted on the Polish 23andme page over on Genarchivist. Seems like most Reddit pages of 23andme Polish and/or Lithuanian testers show some Ashkenazi admixture. If .8-2% isn’t a misreading, then it seems that it’s common Balto-Slavic and/or Germanic ancestry found in both Ashkenazis and Central-Eastern Europeans (Balts, Poles, Ukrainians, etc.).
@Assuwatama how did you get SAHG
I detect siberian_EBA or seima_turbino ancestry in swat_IA samples...
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA:I5396
Distance: 1.5346% / 0.01534645
46.8 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
36.2 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
9.4 Kazakhstan_MLBA_Dali
7.6 seima_turbino
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA:I12471
Distance: 1.7196% / 0.01719605
41.4 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
39.4 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
10.8 Kazakhstan_MLBA_Dali
8.4 seima_turbino
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA:I12445
Distance: 1.6528% / 0.01652828
44.2 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
34.2 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
11.2 seima_turbino
10.4 Kazakhstan_MLBA_Dali
Adding more populations doesn't work either. 459 is really behaving weirdly...
Can someone cross check?
Seems like Armenia_LBA gives same distances as Kazakhstan_MLBA_Dali on G25 for Pakistan_Katelai_IA...
@Simon
I don't have much interest in the topic because I don't see 23andMe as any sort of authority on fine scale European genetic substructures.
Like I already said, their admixture test is very ambitious. Any test that claims to split relatively closely related West Eurasian populations at the haplotype level with an accuracy of almost 100% is extremely ambitious.
There's also the issue of sampling bias, because people who are more likely to be mixed are also more likely to take genetic tests to see how mixed they are.
Indeed, Poles from the countryside and small towns, who are unlikely to have had an Ashkenazi ancestor, are also unlikely to buy a test from 23andMe.
So I'm just going to ignore these online debates about 23andMe results that apparently prove beyond any doubt that someone has 0.8% Ashkenazi admixture, because they're not very useful.
Someone once shared it on this blog.
@Davidski
Do you have any opinions as to how J2b-L283 ended up in a Yamnaya burial in Moldova? Many seem to believe that this lineage was part of the original PIE populations centered around Sredny Stog, not unlike I-L701/L699. I have doubts about this because J-L283 was found in IA/Nuragic Sardinian males without any steppe autosomal input. Now it could have been severely diluted like in that Arslantepe V1636 male, or they could have been low coverage. Either way curious as to your thoughts on this, seeing that various online nationalists have seized this as being evidence that J2b-L283 was among the original PIEs, which it very well could have been.
@Assuwatama
Do I understand correctly that these are non-existent coordinates, these are calculated coordinates? does this mean that ancient people with such coordinates were not discovered?🤭😏🥺🙏😋😀👋
@Assuwatama
what do you think?
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA
Distance: 0.9202% / 0.00920165 | R3P
65.2 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
31.2 Russia_North_Caucasus_MBA
3.6 China_YR_LN
or
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA
Distance: 0.9421% / 0.00942094 | R4P
48.0 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
27.6 Uzbekistan_Bustan_BA
17.8 Russia_Afanasievo
6.6 Laos_Hoabinhian.SG
or
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA
Distance: 0.6615% / 0.00661528 | R4P
50.6 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
26.8 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
19.2 Russia_North_Caucasus
3.4 CHN_Zongri_4500BP
@Assuwatama
Check it out:
https://i.ibb.co/cy74b8h/2024-07-04-04-06-52.png
The Zongri cluster brings together many samples from the Neolithic to the Late Bronze Age, so they can be conditionally taken as a Chinese source
@Simon Stevin
“@Davidski
Do you have any opinions as to how J2b-L283 ended up in a Yamnaya burial in Moldova? Many seem to believe that this lineage was part of the original PIE populations centered around Sredny Stog, not unlike I-L701/L699. I have doubts about this because J-L283 was found in IA/Nuragic Sardinian males without any steppe autosomal input. Now it could have been severely diluted like in that Arslantepe V1636 male, or they could have been low coverage. Either way curious as to your thoughts on this, seeing that various online nationalists have seized this as being evidence that J2b-L283 was among the original PIEs, which it very well could have been”.
Not only the samples of J2b-L283 found in Sardinia have no Yamnaya input in the autosome, but they separated from the upstream J-L283* 5600/5500 years ago, like the samples found in Russia and the Caucasus, and that falsify the mainstream theory that Sardinians are the EEF who came from Anatolia and that also hg J2b could have come from Middle East and recently. About that I wrote, as usual, tons of letters, and even though I admitted that this hg J2b may have come from around the Caucasus, even though I didn’t exclude that it could be present with hg I in western Europe in the Palaeolithic, its presence in Italy and Sardinia is older than its presence in the Balkans etc etc. In the past, fighting against Hunter Provyn and others, I hypothesized that an old minor subclade of J2b (J-P91) could be older even in Poland and Baltic and central Europe, but the oldest presence is always in Sardinia, and that could have to do with the same IE origin if it was linked above all with hg R1a, remained easternmost than hg R1b certainly present in the Alps 14000 years ago but very likely even 17000 years ago.
Yes 😌
Are these the average coordinate? They tend to give way too better distances for odd reasons...
Using same sources I only get 0.026 Distance...though a sample here or there is at 0.012....
For average_Scaled...
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA
Distance: 1.1424% / 0.01142447
44.0 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
41.6 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
14.4 seima_turbino
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA
Distance: 0.7898% / 0.00789798
45.6 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
36.2 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
12.6 Kazakhstan_MLBA_Dali
5.6 seima_turbino
Target: Pakistan_Katelai_IA
Distance: 0.9942% / 0.00994206
64.4 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
25.4 Armenia_LBA
10.2 seima_turbino
@Simon
J2b doesn't look like a Sredny Stog lineage to me, nor even a typical Yamnaya lineage.
It seems to have been absorbed by post-Sredny Stog populations via contacts with various Caucasus-related groups.
@Assuwatama
Yes, these are the average values from David's list Global25_PCA_pop_averages_scaled. In the screenshot, each Katelai sample is shown separately for a better model of sources for the average of Katelai.
There are no strange reasons; if a population has been isolated since it originated from a mix, for example, of two ancestral populations, then the best model should be the average coordinates of all the points of the resulting population. I am not particularly familiar with the theory of this, but I think that is how it works.
Can someone check out this model on qpAdm
Pakistan_Katelai_IA with SiS_ba2 Armenia_LBA and Dali_mlba...
Traditional model with BMAC is giving 57% PC1 variance while switching it with Armenia_LBA is giving PC1 85% variance
@Davidski
“@Simon
J2b doesn't look like a Sredny Stog lineage to me, nor even a typical Yamnaya lineage.
It seems to have been absorbed by post-Sredny Stog populations via contacts with various Caucasus-related groups”.
Of course this is the natural conclusion by looking at the data at our disposal, but you aren’t an ingenue or a “levantinist-kurganist-levantist”, but perhaps a “kurganist-levantinist-kurganist”. Why don’t to think that hg J2b was in the Alps, as hg R1b1 and of course hg I2a, and migrated eastward like R-L23-Z2103 and I-M223 etc? The data at our disposal may permit also this hypothesis and the oldest presence in Sardinia, in Italy, the Balkans and Northern Europe could permit that,.
ISE01; Italy_Neolithic; J2a2-PF5008>L581>Z37823>PF5000 (xY29677,PF5016)
This J2a-PF5000* by Pribislav is upstream even ERS2364940 that is J-Y29677*, that is a downstream samples separated 9700 ybp and 28 SNPs only 500 years (from 10200 to 9700 ybp)? Ahhhh
Need the help of experts to vet these findings...
https://ibb.co/d6SVTBN
https://ibb.co/7bqLNhw
https://ibb.co/TMVNqHt
https://ibb.co/HByr4xQ
@Gio
Brother, J2b-L283 most likely from the Balkans or Anatolia
@Arsen
“@Gio
Brother, J2b-L283 most likely from the Balkans or Anatolia”
It is what pretty much all the people thinks, above all who is from the Balkans (but what have they to do with people of thousands of years ago? Not more than me from Italy) or the Caucasus like you, but I have been studying this matter from so many years and I know that nothing is discounted. You may see that more and more aDNA is tested, and more and more Italy and the Alps get the oldest samples. About hgs R1b1 (Villabruna 14000 ybp) and I-M223 (and even before Tagliente2) that is demonstrated. Let’s wait for other tests. I said many years ago that the Harvardians got the oldest Italian bones of the University of Pisa (Prof Francesco Mallegni) in exchange of the Harvardian-like lab in Florence, and very like this last finding from Apulia is due to them, the first man even though, probably, they had the permission only to test the mt….
Regarding the J2b L283 sample from Crihana Veche, Moldova (Movila Gologan Kurgan):
-Robust Proto Europoid
-Extremely pronounced muscle insertions
-At least 1.81m tall, one of the largest Yamnaya skeletons to date
-Modeled as Core Yamnaya 84%, Tell Yunatsite 16% (more likely Trypillian)
-Sits on the Dnipro Cline and Caucasus Lower Volga Cline
-Typical Yamnaya burial with atypical inventory, an arrowhead.
Per the preprint, Core Yamnaya forms somewhere between the Dnipro and Don Rivers around 4000 BCE and expansion around a half millennium later, approximately 3500 BCE. Preprint estimates 3642 BCE, J2b L283 mirrors this with 8 branches expanding during the Eneolithic forming at 3600/3500 BC, with many more between 3100/3000 BCE.
A slam dunk case for a Sredny Stog (Late SS between the Dnipro/Don Rivers) with western Core Yamnaya into the Balkans around 3000 BCE.
J2b L283 so far found amongst:
-Yamnaya
-Mycenaeans
-Cetina Culture
-Maros Culture (western Yamnaya derived)
-Illyrians
-Daunians
-Picenes
-La Tene Culture
-Western Hallstatt
-Etruscans
-Nuragic Sardinians
Where hasn’t J2b L283 been found?
-Anywhere in peninsular Europe during the Neolithic. Not in Varna, Karanovo, Gumelnitsa, Lengyel, Sopot, Cucuteni, Trypillian, Tiszapolgar, Bodrogkeresztur, Globular Amphora, or any other Neolithic group there.
https://www.yfull.com/tree/j-l283/
@Gio 🤌
@Simon and Davidski
'Well it seems this isn’t too uncommon, at least based on the results posted on the Polish 23andme page over on Genarchivist'
Genearchivist are known crackpots. Additionally, not to add onto Davidski's point directly, but 23%+&me reddit results are not a good sample for population genetics, fine-scale or not. The results are dealing with noise level instances at no more than 1%, this is not reliable data and as Davidski already mentioned twice, the Ashkenazi population has an extremely dominant effect on any sort of haplotype analysis which can cause issues like this. This is not data any sane person would use to make a broad claim on ancestry.
Again, not to add to Davidski directly again but he rightly put and as I have mentioned in an early response, Ashkenazi populations mostly, if not entirely lived in urban areas where trade and economy were possible occupations. Records support this and they support the low levels of inter-marriage which also occurred in urban areas mostly (and quite late in history all considered).
The last real issue is that Jews were still a minority population. They naturally had little to no genetic impact on their host populations. The Afrikaans of Southern Africa are a good example of this sort of effect.
Regardless, the fact no major study has ever mentioned even minor Ashkenazic ancestry in Poles, whether it be autosomal or haplogroups is quite telling. The past was far more tribal and bigoted, like it or not.
the Y-haplo de Villabruna seems an exception in the cluster he was included in (majority of Y-I2a?) and Villabruna shew some EHG input if I read well. 14000 BP is after the late heating shoot and then people were more and more rowming allover Europe (great increase in populations size); so no need of a glacial refuge in Italy for the people of the time. BTW even at the LGM very maximum, people were settled as far north as Belgium, even if sometimes, in the most northern places, we can suppose it was only during summer. Until more new data I keep on thinking Y-R1b V88 ancestors (upstream) and cousins appeared there coming from East.
Noble Goth wrote "Regardless, the fact no major study has ever mentioned even minor Ashkenazic ancestry in Poles, whether it be autosomal or haplogroups is quite telling." Sure they did. The 2013 study "The History of Slavs Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequences" found the Ashkenazi-specific haplogroup L2a1l2a in an ethnic Pole, the 2007 study "Complex interactions of the Eastern and Western Slavic populations with other European groups as revealed by mitochondrial DNA analysis" found the commonly Ashkenazic haplogroup K1a1b1a in ethnic Poles, and my 2022 study "The Maternal Genetic Lineages of Ashkenazic Jews" found the commonly Ashkenazic haplogroup K1a9 in an ethnic Pole. Autosomally, the 2009 study "Admixture between Ashkenazi Jews and Central Europeans" concluded that "1.8% of Polish [HLA] haplotypes [on chromosome 6] may be of Ashkenazi origin".
In evaluating the potential Ashkenazic ancestry of a Polish person who matches Jews, I often take into account Davidski's Eurogenes K36 calculator's results. If the Pole scores 0% in all West Asian elements (Arabian, Armenian, East Mediterranean, Near Eastern, and West Caucasian), then we can usually rule out them having had a common Ashkenazic ancestor and instead assume that their common ancestor was a Pole. But some Poles do show one or more of those elements and some of those people are not part-Armenian ethnically but 1 or 2 percent Ashkenazic. The Polish GEDmatch tester I mentioned above who has 5 Jewish (Ashkenazic and Sephardic) segments scores 1.34% Armenian and 0.47% West Caucasian in Eurogenes K36.
@Kevin Brook
Maybe I worded myself incorrectly, but no major study has shown widespread Ashkenazic ancestry in Poles, that's the point. MtDNA L is extremely uncommon in Poland in general and (to my memory) doesn't even make up 0.5 if the paternal lineages in Poland. The maternal pool of Poland has had little shift since the Iron age.
Additionally, using a 2009 study is dubious. Studies from so long ago are known for errors or various misunderstandings and then isn't limited to Polish genetics either. Davidski has already made a comment on this blog-post in regards to the issues in separating Ashkenazic and Polish haplotypes - using a study from 15 years ago just seems to be grasping, especially when we know the issues that can be caused in regards to haplotype analysis with Slavs and Ashkenazis.
The only real issue with K36 is again, it's a sweeping statement. Some Poles do have Ashkenazic ancestry, that isn't out the question. The issue is most do not. We have a good record date of when Jewish and Gentile marriages began to occur and much of the time any sort of test or analysis is able to show that. I've played around with G25 and you have sparked an interest in regards to how you fiddled with K36 to test a few more options, but regardless, out of the samples provided on the Eurogenes blog for Poles, about 2 show clear Ashkenazic ancestry using the Natufian component as a defining reference, and 1-2 others if my memory recalls correct that show possible Ashkenazic ancestry. Regardless, I'll do some more digging in regards to it and play around with it when I have some time too.
Cheers for some insight. I clearly need to re-work my wording to be more suited for others to understand my points. I'll give your paper a read as well given how recent it is.
It's not controversial for an ethnic Pole to actually have 0.8% Ashkenazi ancestry that shows up consistently in different tests.
But that HLA study is controversial. HLA genes don't provide useful data for admixture because they're affected by selection.
It seems that Pribislav didn’t check the 17000 years ago sample from Apulia we spoke above about. He has been our Italian-Iberian who made that:
As per the BAM file (a whopping 70+ Gigabyte file) was I2a1a1 I-CTS595*(xCTS2879,S19554). He had roughly half of the I2a1a1a SNPs as positive and the other half negative.
I-M26 is at the same level as I-L158 as per YFull and I listed all the I-L158 calls in my prior post. Either way, below is the list of all the Derived and Ancestral calls ("State" column).
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1...ue&sd=true
This time Pribislav won’t be able to say that people of Apulia did come from the Balkans, we have Tagliente 2, this person all of 17000 years ago, and the 40% of Sardinians and probably they spoke the Caucasian languages of the Alps (Old Sardinian and Basque now), thus his old ancestor were “Italians”, “Palaeolithic Italians”.
@ Moesan
''the Y-haplo de Villabruna seems an exception in the cluster he was included in (majority of Y-I2a?) and Villabruna shew some EHG input if I read well. 14000 BP is after the late heating shoot and then people were more and more rowming allover Europe (great increase in populations size); so no need of a glacial refuge in Italy for the people of the time''
Agree. I think Villabruna cluster is an unfortunate name, as VB is late Epigravettian and already has some EHG , and the obviously distinctive Y-hg
'Tagliente' cluster would be a better name, with the understanding Italy is not the source of this population
@ Gio
'This time Pribislav won’t be able to say that people of Apulia did come from the Balkans, we have Tagliente 2, this person all of 17000 years ago, and the 40% of Sardinians and probably they spoke the Caucasian languages of the Alps (Old Sardinian and Basque now), thus his old ancestor were “Italians”, “Palaeolithic Italians”''
Slavic-related I2a-CTS10228 is different to I2a-M26.
The presence of I2a in post-Ice Age italy imples large migration into the peninsula after the LGM
@ Davidski
''J2b doesn't look like a Sredny Stog lineage to me, nor even a typical Yamnaya lineage.
It seems to have been absorbed by post-Sredny Stog populations via contacts with various Caucasus-related groups.''
in their haste to prove J2b2 is a 'typical Yamnaya lineage'', some internet genealogists for some reason omit the fact that J2b2 appears with the Majkop-related Zhivotolovka Volchansk context
@Rob
"@ Gio
'This time Pribislav won’t be able to say that people of Apulia did come from the Balkans, we have Tagliente 2, this person all of 17000 years ago, and the 40% of Sardinians and probably they spoke the Caucasian languages of the Alps (Old Sardinian and Basque now), thus his old ancestor were “Italians”, “Palaeolithic Italians”''
Slavic-related I2a-CTS10228 is different to I2a-M26.
The presence of I2a in post-Ice Age Italy imples large migration into the peninsula after the LGM"
Rob, I have to search when you begin to write about this matter. When I began, all people thought that there was no refuge in Italy, that all came "Ex Oriente lux", some people translated Etruscan and Italian through Albanian (that has 40% of Latin words) etc. I remember that I-M223* expanded from Mesolithic Italy and it is the ancestor of all the eastern hg I. Let's wait for other tests. I explained in my posts why Harvard doesn't do that, but my posts weren't published.
Possibly interesting for you y-chromosome heads:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.05.602100v1.full.pdf -
"Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny"
"Abstract - Genetic variation in the non-recombining part of the human Y chromosome has provided important insight into the paternal history of human populations. However, a significant and yet unexplained branch length variation of Y chromosome lineages has been observed, notably amongst those that are highly diverged from the human reference Y chromosome.
Understanding the origin of this variation, which has previously been attributed to changes in generation time, mutation rate, or efficacy of selection, is important for accurately reconstructing human evolutionary and demographic history.
Here, we analyze Y chromosomes from present-day and ancient modern humans, as well as Neandertals, and show that branch length variation amongst human Y chromosomes cannot solely be explained by differences in demographic or biological processes.
Instead, reference bias results in mutations being missed on Y chromosomes that are highly diverged from the reference used for alignment.
We show that masking fast-evolving, highly divergent regions of the human Y chromosome mitigates the effect of this bias and enables more accurate determination of branch lengths in the Y chromosome phylogeny.
Finally, we show that this approach allows us to estimate the age of ancient samples from Y chromosome sequence data and provide updated TMRCA estimates using the portion of the Y chromosome where the effect of reference bias is minimised."
@Gio
Personally i don't think there were no refuge in Italy. It would be ridiculous thinking like that. My thoughts is that all the people rowming around Italy after the LGM may not be put in the "refuge" sack. It has been a time every people and every Y-haplo (and every language) was coming from the Near-East or south the Caucasus, I would not believe now that every people and every Y-haplo came from an Italian refuge. Every case deserve data and good interpretation.
@Moesan
It is worth noting that Italy is a good candidate for refuge of peoples during the Ice Age, the Alps protect the Italian Peninsula from cold air masses from the north even in the coldest times of the year, as well as the fact that it is surrounded by the Mediterranean Sea on all sides, softens and moisturizes the climate this peninsula, so it is likely that there was a high population density there during the last ice age, the same applies to Georgia, it is also covered from the north by the Caucasus ridge, which prevents the penetration of cold air masses from the north, and even in the coldest times the temperature it rarely drops below zero, this applies to the entire Black Sea coast, on the southern slopes of the Caucasus ridge
@Moesan
@Gio
Personally i don't think there were no refuge in Italy. It would be ridiculous thinking like that. My thoughts is that all the people rowming around Italy after the LGM may not be put in the "refuge" sack. It has been a time every people and every Y-haplo (and every language) was coming from the Near-East or south the Caucasus, I would not believe now that every people and every Y-haplo came from an Italian refuge. Every case deserve data and good interpretation.
This is just the prejudice of the "Ex Oriente lux", shared by the Harvardians for religious prejudices, sponsored and pour cause by the FTDNA, and just for the last facts (wars I do mean) the same FTDNA is abandoning if they say: "It very much looks like an out of Italy near the end of the Ice Age, showing first in France shortly after the great Ice Melt", and I can not say more because Davidski wouldn't publish that. Yours is the same line of the "Southern Arc" theory, but my hg, R1b1 etc, did come from Southern East Asia and Siberia before arriving in the Alpine zone, and our Language, probably due to the brother group R1a remained easternmost, came from the Siberian corridor. No old R1b has been found in Anatolia, Middle East, Iran.
@Gio
you wrote: "Yours is the same line of the "Southern Arc" theory"
Absokutely not. I don't see how. I just say I'm doubtful about theories tending to localize a lot of diverses lignages and cultures in a same peculiar region. These kind of "wombs" of Humanity here ad there according to diverse believings or agendas. I rather agree with you Y-R1b had not dwelled in Near-East surroundings, Anatolia or Iran until relatively recent times ( Chalco or just before?).
@Moesan
"@Gio
you wrote: "Yours is the same line of the "Southern Arc" theory"
Absokutely not. I don't see how. I just say I'm doubtful about theories tending to localize a lot of diverses lignages and cultures in a same peculiar region. These kind of "wombs" of Humanity here ad there according to diverse believings or agendas. I rather agree with you Y-R1b had not dwelled in Near-East surroundings, Anatolia or Iran until relatively recent times ( Chalco or just before?)"
I appreciate your admission about R1b, but it was easy to do that after all the aDNA tested and the millions that who own the finance of the Western World spent for testing Anatolia and Middle East. It was more difficult 20 Years ago when Underhill and his sponsors wrote the papers about R1a in Iran, but my theory is wide and you don't know all of that, because you don't know all what I wrote and published in all my life, the first the poems when I was 17, in 1965.
@ Arsen
“ It is worth noting that Italy is a good candidate for refuge of peoples during the Ice Age, the Alps protect the Italian Peninsula from cold air masses from the north even in the coldest times of the year”
That doesn’t change the fact that we have clear genetic evidence of population change in Italy before & after the ice age
@ Gio
“ Rob, I have to search when you begin to write about this matter”
About Italy in the ice age specifically ? :)
@Rob
"@ Gio
“Rob, I have to search when you begin to write about this matter”
About Italy in the ice age specifically ? :)
If you are who I thought you were, you are much younger than me, and, as I said in the answer to Moesan below, I have been writing about these arguments from 60 years, not only about genetics of course, but about all the rest, that I think influences also genetics, even though many would prefer to keep them separated.
@Gio
May I ask you your age?
@Arsen
"@Gio
May I ask you your age?"
Of course, all my data is public, and all my DNA tests. I was born on 5 March 1948.
AHAHAH, IF 17000 YEARS AREN’T ENOUGH
(Yesterday, 10:39 PM)CowboyHG Wrote:I think the persisting puzzle of WHG is the nature of 'West Asian' admixture.
From what I've seen Pinarbasi, Kotias_UP and Dzudzuana all appear as valid sources (Tagliente, ST, etc don;t really require additional ANE).
But the difficulty lies in characterizing the nature of the west Asian signal, due to the lack of a clear archaeological or uniparental 'trail' for migration into Europe from Anatolia or the Caucasus c. 20,000 bp
There's a few different possibilities. Each generating it's own set of consequences.
1) Georgia_UP > WHG
Consequence: WHG > Pinarbasi, unaccounted for affinity between WHG and IBM.
Italy_Tagliente_HG
Gravettian_Italy 0.455511 0.0335358 13.5829
Gravettian_France_Fournol 0.102969 0.0291348 3.53423
AG3 0.100565 0.0222039 4.52915
Dzudzuana 0.340955 0.0299383 11.3886
Tail: 0.20
right = c('Congo_Mbuti.DG', 'ZlatyKun.SG', 'Ust_Ishim.DG', 'BachoKiro_IUP', 'China_UP', 'Andaman_100BP.SG', 'RUS_Primorsky_DevilsCave_N.SG', 'Kostenki14', 'Sunghir.SG', 'Muierii1', 'Gravettian_KremsVestonice', 'GoyetQ116_1', 'BachoKiro_BK1653', 'Yana_UP.SG', 'MA1.SG', 'Peru_RioUncallane_1800BP.SG', 'Kotias_UP.SG', 'Iran_Wezmeh_N.SG')
allsnps=TRUE
2) Pinarbasi > WHG
Consequence: Unaccounted for affinity between WHG and Georgia_UP
Italy_Tagliente_HG
Gravettian_Italy 0.470362 0.0311741 15.0882
Gravettian_France_Fournol 0.108964 0.0260019 4.19063
AG3 0.0841425 0.0204118 4.12224
Anatolia_Boncuklu_N 0.336531 0.0260073 12.9399
Tail: 0.21
right = c('Congo_Mbuti.DG', 'ZlatyKun.SG', 'Ust_Ishim.DG', 'BachoKiro_IUP', 'China_UP', 'Andaman_100BP.SG', 'RUS_Primorsky_DevilsCave_N.SG', 'Kostenki14', 'Sunghir.SG', 'Muierii1', 'Gravettian_KremsVestonice', 'GoyetQ116_1', 'BachoKiro_BK1653', 'Yana_UP.SG', 'MA1.SG', 'Peru_RioUncallane_1800BP.SG', 'Anatolia_Epipaleolithic', 'Iran_Wezmeh_N.SG', 'Taforalt')
allsnps=TRUE
3) 'CWE' > WHG & Near-East
Consequence: Georgia_UP and Pinarbasi have different streams of Basal ancestry. Taforalt = CWE + ANA. WHG = CWE + Gravettian + ANE
It dates back to approximately three thousand years ago and the ancestor who carried the pathogenetic variant responsible for hereditary breast cancer was from Garfagnana or Versilia. This is what emerged from the study coordinated by Maria Adelaide Caligo, director of the Molecular Genetics section of the Aoup, according to which the presence of this variant would determine a particularly high percentage of developing breast cancer (between 45 and 79%) and ovarian cancer (between 39 and 48%).
It depends on whether this variant indicates only local spread or whether it indicates its origin. In this case it could be proof of what I wrote about the origin of the Ashkenazi Jews not only from Imperial Rome but specifically from our Garfagnana-Versilia area, already detected for other mutations present in Ashkenazi Jews such as at least two other genetic diseases that I have once indicated.
@Gio
wow. you are not much older than my late grandfather, and he couldn’t even use the TV remote control properly, let alone a computer or a telephone, respect!
@Davidski
Seeing that this Altoatesino/Tyrolean guy in Genarchivist uses your calculator, can you say your opinion about what he says?
https://genarchivist.com/showthread.php?tid=980&pid=25728#pid25728
"Yes Basques are more WHG shifted than Spanish, Portuguese, Italians, Greeks etc but they have about half as much as Balts and Slavs who descend from the WHG resurgence in central/east Europe, especially Slavs. Basques have 1-2% WHG yDNA i2, their WHG ancestry is almost entirely from females. They have much more ANF autosomal and even yDNA".
Of course I have nothing against Austria. My daughter is now studying in Vienna and speaks perfectly German language and she feels very well up there, and, have I being against the war against Ussr in 1941, I think that the Alto Adige solution was good as would have been good also towards Slavs if History would have gone else and it would have been good also for other European lands, but his reasoning seems to me almost ideological. The WHG of Basque would have been pretty much due to females, but the Palaeolithic I2a-M26 is at 40% in Sardinia, and Sardinia is considered for the most part of EEF origin. My thoughts are that Basque and Old Sardinian spoke a Caucasian language of the Alpine region and it was the language of hg I2a (and I think also of hg R1b1 from east, i.e. Villabruna).
@Arsen
"@Gio
wow. you are not much older than my late grandfather, and he couldn’t even use the TV remote control properly, let alone a computer or a telephone, respect!"
I have no doubt that when you get your grandfather's age, you'll be able to use all these tools and the next to come, and don't forget that I am nothing respect these people much older than me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1wUNBxCsxc
but his best interpretation is this (hear his only):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V49yx8Ye38A
A little personal note. Menahem Pressler, an Ashkenazi, is the picture of the first cousin of my grandfather Alberto Tognoni (1892-1974), i.e. Orlando Tognoni, and Orlando Tognoni Jans is my grandson. I see in these faces the Siberian origin that I think is also of our Y's.
Here is the reconstruction of the Caucasian hunter from the Satanay cave, and you know what? he doesn't look Caucasian
https://x.com/Sulkalmakh/status/1811382208516567518
Population genetic admixture and evolutionary history in the Shandong Peninsula inferred from integrative modern and ancient genomic resources
https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-024-10514-9
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.21.599526v1 - Long shared haplotypes identify the Southern Urals as a primary source for the 10th century Hungarians
During the Hungarian Conquest in the 10th century CE, the early medieval Magyars, a group of mounted warriors from Eastern Europe, settled in the Carpathian Basin. They likely introduced the Hungarian language to this new settlement area, during an event documented by both written sources and archaeological evidence. Previous archaeogenetic research identified the newcomers as migrants from the Eurasian steppe. However, genome-wide ancient DNA from putative source populations has not been available to test alternative theories of their precise source. We generated genome-wide ancient DNA data for 131 individuals from candidate archaeological contexts in the Circum-Uralic region in present-day Russia. Our results tightly link the Magyars to people of the Early Medieval Karayakupovo archaeological horizon on both the European and Asian sides of the southern Urals. Our analyes show that ancestors of the people of the Karayakupovo archaeological horizon were established in the Southern Urals by the Iron Age and that their descendants persisted locally in the Volga-Kama region until at least the 14th century.
Here's another addition in my favor: this person, whom I previously mentioned in this blog when discussing thrombophilia, gave a new interview-podcast. He says that almost 40% of the mitochondrial DNA found in Dagestanis is also prevalent in Europe, and he states that it originally came from Dagestan, dating back to at least the Neolithic period. This DNA spread to Europeans through Indo-European herders. He cautiously speculates why Dagestani female haplogroups are found among Europeans, but there are no male J1 haplogroups. This person, without knowing the autosomes, comes to the same conclusion as I did: that Indo-European herders are the product of Dagestani women and EHG (Eastern Hunter-Gatherer) men (in simplified terms). He doesn't know about the Yamnaya culture and Indo-European herders, etc., but based purely on mtDNA, he made the same conclusion.
https://youtu.be/cMtSEbJ-9RU?si=Kji58PS9AnuP7GnT&t=1460
@Matt
We already did know that from a paper of many years ago that I remember having read.
J2b and J2 as a whole is obviously related to Caucasus or EEF. The fact that there is 1 Yamnaya sample is pretty meaningless. The two hunter gatherer groups of the steppe were R1b in the east and I2 in the west. There will be minimal spillover from the Caucasus from Maykop groups or proto-Maykop groups to the flat lands but they are not indigenous to the territory. Just like R1b is not indigenous to Africa or anywhere in the Middle East, but indeed it is found there in a minority and through historical Bronze Age migrations, and the known event into SSA for V88. The Ra-Ra men who obviously carry J2 or in some cases E-V13 are a little tedious as it's well established these were completely different people from the beginning.
Genomelink has released a report on Basque ancestry. It's ridiculous: "Genetic studies have shown that the Basques are one of the most ancient populations in Europe, with a lineage that predates the arrival of Indo-European-speaking peoples. The Basques are believed to be direct descendants of the early hunter-gatherers who inhabited Europe during the Paleolithic era, around 35,000 years ago. Their genetic profile has remained remarkably stable over millennia, suggesting a high degree of continuity and isolation from other populations." LOL, the old theory of Basques being a WHG population still thrives, at least among the authors of genomelink.
Did someone see that formation of R1a-L657 in Y-full tree site is now 2350 BCE? Or this new tool to solve Y chromosome phylogeny?
https://tinyurl.com/4hbka9kc
@Davidski
What are your thoughts concerning EAS003, the so called “West African” Anglo-Saxon era Briton certain media outlets have been parading around? This came out of that 2022 Anglo-Saxon archaeogenetics paper. I’m not conspiracy minded, but this whole thing seems convenient and off. It’s extraordinary a genome like this would be discovered out of all the skeletal remains from Anglo-Saxon Britain. I found further analysis from some Genarchivist posters that points to a more realistic model of North African Berber descent, which has some additional West African (apparently preferably Central African) and East African admixture baked in. So unsurprisingly, the media is misrepresenting these findings—if they’re legit that is—to justify certain political agendas. However, the skeletal remains have no direct carbon dating, which makes me inclined to be skeptical. That and they’re apparently withholding her for further analysis (her own paper?). The handling of this whole thing reeks regardless imo.
So, according to David Reich there is a study upcoming on Dutch historical genetics. From farmers to Bell Beakers. And according to him there was full replacement. And subsequently they migrated to the UK.
Why's the sample Czech_IA:I7953 now considered a IA sample? Is this correct? In the paper Nick Patterson et al. 2021 it was presented as a Chalcolithic sample, about 2450 BC. In G25 it's closest to the outlier from Viking age Scotland, followed by the early Medieval Baiuvari.
I think this resemblance to younger samples is an additional hint that the younger date may be correct. This individual doesn't resemble other Iron Age Bohemians, it's close to Germanic people instead, so it's probably an immigrant from further north, in all likelihood from the early Elbe Germani.
A new paper rejects what David Anthony considered in a recent talk available in youtube, that Yamnaya people could have ride horses:
Hosek, James, & Taylor, ( 20 September, 2024). "Tracing horseback riding and transport in the human skeleton" in: Science Advances.
Only DOM2 horses can be considered the earliest, at the end of 3rd millennium BCE, in Sintashta culture.
What happened to this blog? Is there a new one?
@PCA_010
Back soon.
Good to hear, I was starting to get worried.
He had to do a Carlos Quilles after they found R1a in Usatovo
Neither transportation nor travel needed horses. The Plains Indians moved materials and equipment with dogs -- the dogsled is plainly preferred to horses in some terrains. Asses were effective transport on mountain roads. Bovines were not fast, but were powerful and preferred for heavy carrying. You can ride a bovine. Trade and travel by animal power may have been well developed before DOM2
The bullock teams would have been a big deal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_animal#/media/File:Bullock_team.jpg
David, are you okay? I hope you are just very busy.
Mr. Davidsky is busy, he has a lot of work to do.
I've just been rereading the Laziridis et al 2022 Southern Arc article. It does strike me a good candidate for the speakers of Indo-Hittite would be the Leyla-Tepe culture who seem to have discovered copper-smelting. Spreading northwards the Maykop culture would be there successor culture adopting their language with some genetic input and becoming the speakers of classic Proto-Indo-European. There is some evidence suggesting the Maykop culture invented the wheeled vehicle (or at least the handcart) which was then developed into the horse-drawn waggon either by them or by Yamnaya who would be their cultural and linguistic successors.
The Kura-Araxes culture would then be a good candidate for Proto-Anatolian. It is sometimes identified as Hurrite, however the Hurrites are later identified as living a bit further south. Also if the Kura-Araxes culture is not Proto-Anatolian there doesn't seem to be any other available location for the Proto-anatolians.
@Ned
The Laziridis et al 2022 Southern Arc article was outdated and wrong back in 2022.
It's even more outdated and wrong now. It should be retracted, or at least corrected (but of course it never will be).
Leyla-Tepe is nothing; it went extinct.
Kura-Araxes is not sometimes but generally identified with the spread of Hurrian, and it ranged all the way to the Levant, so I don't know what you mean when you say Hurrians lived south of there. Did they live in Africa?
Try and update yourself.
Thanks for your response!
Leyla-Tepe did go extinct but after it had influenced Maykop. It is also the first known user of copper metallurgy which would mean that its influence at the time would've been greater than its size warranted. It is also not far from Aknashan at the southern end of the CLV Cline (Lazarides Reich 2024). My understanding was that Hurrians were found in Southeastern anatolia south of lake Van whilst the Kura-Araxes was to the North and to the west of that. The identification of any language group with Kura-Araxes is guess-work however there are not many options.
Ned - "The earliest current evidence of copper smelting, dating from between 5500 BC and 5000 BC, has been found in Pločnik and Belovode, Serbia.[12][13] A mace head found in Turkey and dated to 5000 BC, once thought to be the oldest evidence, now appears to be hammered, native copper"
https://www.stonepages.com/news/archives/002557.html
Copper, though in the form of small drops, is found in the burials of the Nalchik burial ground 1000 years before Maykop
I'm sorry, not in the burials, but in the second layer of settlements of the Yaseneva Polyana type corresponding to the Nalchik burial ground
@Vladimir/Davidski Have you read the latest report of 'Nalchik' man and the proposed spread of farming from Eastern mesopotamia to Khvalinsk? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004224021886 I stumbled on it following Vladimir's comments on copper. Too early for Indo-european though. The article does include the interesting sentence "... the Northern
Caucasus culture. It is the influence of the latter culture on the Yamnaya population in the adjacent
steppe rather than the influence of the Maykop culture that manifests itself through archaeological
finds more vividly"
@Ned
Another poor paper, similar in its stupidity to the Southern Arc paper.
Khvalynsk people weren't farmers. They were hunter-gatherers and part time herders.
And there's no way to link Khvalynsk to any Mesopotamian culture with via some broad allele frequencies.
Tasmola weren't Indo-Iranian...
But an interesting cline runs from TKM_IA to Tasmola...
I propose Turkmenistan_IA like population as the source of East Iranic languages and they brought this language family east into Khotan, North into steppe and west into steppe...and Tasmola as some kind of Hunnic/Turkic...
Target: Kazakhstan_Tasmola_EIA
Distance: 0.6872% / 0.00687179
47.4 Mongolia_LBA_Khovsgol_6
44.2 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
8.4 Kazakhstan_Kumsay_EBA
TianShan_Hun are largely Tasmola like so Hunnic language is from Tasmola but the outlier Huns are TianShan_Saka like hence spoke east Iranian...
Target: Kyrgyzstan_TianShan_Hun
Distance: 0.7790% / 0.00779042
83.4 Kazakhstan_Tasmola_EIA
16.6 Turkmenistan_IA
At the same time an interesting cline is going from TianShan_Saka to Sintashta_MLBA in center of which sits Sarmatian_IA
Target: Kazakhstan_Sarmatian_IA
Distance: 0.9818% / 0.00981756
49.4 Kyrgyzstan_TianShan_Saka
48.0 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
2.6 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
So Sarmatian low BMAC is an outcome of indirect mixing or back migration of Saka with steppe_mlba groups (like kashkarchi) in western steppe...This BMAC further dilutes in the modern East Iranic groups in that region...
PCA
https://imgur.com/a/os8UpbO
Also interesting is the closeness of TianShan_Hun to Bashkirs and to some Hungary_Conqueror_Elite on PCA
https://imgur.com/a/bpDUVwi
@Davidski
I came across this chronological map on one of your posts, I still have a screenshot but I can't find the site itself, could you share the link
https://ibb.co/wcwgVqj
@arsen
That looks like the homeland.ku.dk map.
ok, i found it, thanks https://homeland.ku.dk/
Published: 30 October 2024: "The rise and transformation of Bronze Age pastoralists in the Caucasus" Ghalichi et al.
"The Caucasus and surrounding areas, with their rich metal resources, became a crucible of the Bronze Age and the birthplace of the earliest steppe pastoralist societies. Yet, despite this region having a large influence on the subsequent development of Europe and Asia, questions remain regarding its hunter-gatherer past and its formation of expansionist mobile steppe societies. Here we present new genome-wide data for 131 individuals from 38 archaeological sites spanning 6,000 years. We find a strong genetic differentiation between populations north and south of the Caucasus mountains during the Mesolithic, with Eastern hunter-gatherer ancestry in the north, and a distinct Caucasus hunter-gatherer ancestry with increasing East Anatolian farmer admixture in the south. During the subsequent Eneolithic period, we observe the formation of the characteristic West Eurasian steppe ancestry and heightened interaction between the mountain and steppe regions, facilitated by technological developments of the Maykop cultural complex. By contrast, the peak of pastoralist activities and territorial expansions during the Early and Middle Bronze Age is characterized by long-term genetic stability. The Late Bronze Age marks another period of gene flow from multiple distinct sources that coincides with a decline of steppe cultures, followed by a transformation and absorption of the steppe ancestry into highland populations."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08113-5
Ghalichi et al (30 October 2024) shows the following: R1a1 in two outliers from Steppe Maykop culture, KUG005 and SA6013, 3617-3374 BC, and 3340-3096 BC. Another R1a from Epipalaeolithic site Satanaj Grotto, Russia, SJG001, 6223-6080 BC. And a Srubnaya culture sample, KVO013, with R1a-Z93,(R1a1a1b2-), 1617-1517 BC.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08113-5
Davidsky, what can you say about the samples from Remontnoye and Zolotorevka?
@Arsen
At a first glance it seemed to me that all the R1 hgs did come to Caucasus from Yamnaya or elsewhere in Europe and I think from west at the beginning. Only some old R1 and 1 R1a of course from eastern Europe, but I have to study the paper, anyway good to hear something by Davidski.
@Arsen
I'll be posting about that soon in detail.
J-L283 is kinda interesting...Its cousin clade J-Z2444 is found most among Indians...entry point of this clade into India is perhaps 6000-4500bce with CHG/IranN component...some migrating to Central Asia where we have 1 sample from Bustan and later in Swat from where we have 2 samples...67 Indians are under this clade...
Although it depends where the ancestor was, could be an expansion from Mehargarh, North Iran and South Caucasus....
@David
Do you think Yamnaya derived its language from EHG or CHG?
32 under J-Z2444
67 under parent J-M241 whose 2 descendant lineages are J-Z2444 and J-L283
@Assuwatama
by the way yes, it is possible that it got into the BMAC from the South Caucasus, then together with the Indo-Iranians R1a-Z93 it got to India
Well, this thread started recognizing my mistake about the appearance of 3 samples of L51 in Yamnaya (or rather the culture of the catacombs) and a few months later after analyzing the BAM FILEs it turns out that none of them is L51. We already have more than 250 male genomes of Repin>Yamnaya-Afanasievo in the Russian-Ukrainian steppes in all their regional variants and you know what? none of them is R1b-L51>L151. Harvardians and Kurganist friends, sorry but you have to keep looking.
@Arsen
I think most of these lines independent of BMAC were already present in India by 3500bce...
https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/J-Z2444/tree
@Gaska
That's interesting, I never attributed much significance to these even assuming they were L51. We know the Yamnaya were overwhelmingly across the board Z2103 and cannot be the paternal ancestor of Corded Ware or Bell Beaker. People who can't understand that are in an arrested state of cognitive dissonance, prone to tantrums stupid comments and not worth interacting with. David Reich has now come out and stated himself Core Yamnaya ancestry was female mediated into Corded Ware. Female mediated ancestry cannot be the source of PIE 🤣.
I think we need to relook the events happening in Central Asia...I don't have qpadm output but as per G25 it seems chalcolithic Turanians got largely replaced by people from Eastern Iran...80% of the BMAC ancestry is coming from ShahTepe_BA and Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA1 population...
Target: Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
Distance: 0.8643% / 0.00864268
41.4 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA1
38.4 Iran_ShahTepe_BA
18.6 CentralAsianFarmer
1.6 Kazakhstan_Kumsay_EBA
On PCA BMAC_Gonur is sitting in middle of ShahTepe_BA and Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA1...
https://imgur.com/a/xCnDGMK
@Assuwatama
yes, and these samples of shah tepe have a mixture with the Caucasus (kura araks), also a small steppe admixture, plus the sample sha012 has a Y chromosome also associated with kura araks, so it is not surprising where the haplogroups from the Caucasus came from in the BMAC culture
https://i.ibb.co/JQkt5xC/1730460373626.jpg
Reich is an honest and intelligent guy, and he knows that in early CWC-Bohemia half of the mitochondrial markers are Yamnaya-Afanasievo, only a bunch of knuckleheads keep denying the importance of exogamy in the transmission of any autosomal signal (WHG, ANF or Yamnaya). He also has unpublished genomes of the CWC in the Netherlands and knows that there is no trace of steppe genetics (uniparental and autosomal) so we will soon have more surprises. The genetic relationship and the fact of sharing uniparental male and female markers makes me think that the genetic differences between WHG and EHG are minimal, why would they speak different languages? Even I2a-L699 has its origin in the hunter-gatherers of the Villabruna cluster. Unless the Surcaucasian migrations changed the language of the Yamnaya culture, the steppe herders spoke the language of their European hunter-gatherer ancestors, whichever language family they belonged to. In any case, what has been demonstrated is the origin of the uniparental male markers of the Yamnaya culture in the WHG. What do you think of these samples?
*LOSCHBOUR (6.105 BCE)-mesolithic, Luxembourg-I2a-M423>V6473-Fu, 2.013
*KGH6 (4.699 BCE)-Killuragh, Limerick, Ireland_Mesolithic-I2a-P37>M423>V6473
*STG001 (3.857 BCE)-Steigen, Scandinavian HGs, Norway-I2a-M423>V6473
*I32497 (2.800 BCE)-Kamyshta, Khakassia, Afanasievo-I2a-M423-S2770>V4673-Lazaridis, 2.024
*VILLABRUNA (12.105 BCE)-Villabruna, Epigravettian, Italy-R1b1a-L754>L761
*I8952 (2.795 BCE)-Mokro-Chaltyrsky, Don_EBA_Yamnaya-R1b-L754>L761-Lazaridis, 2.024
*I4630 (7.272 BCE)-ZVEJ30-Zvejnieki II, Latvia_HG-R1b1a/1a-P297>Y13200
*I12964 (3.267 BCE)-Sakhtish2a, burial34, Volosovo, Russia-R1b1a/1a-Y13200
*I20559 (3.003 BCE)-Afanasieva-Gora, Afanasievo-Yenisei -R1b1a/1a-Y13200
*I6731 (2.999 BCE)-Leschevo3, EBA_Samara_Yamnaya, Russia-R1b1a/1a-Y13200
Am I the only one who hasn't been able to log into Genarchivist for three days?
Nope. The site is down and has been for about five whole days.
EHG and WHG cover a huge swath of different cultures and speaking of them as homogeneous united cultural units beyond the early Epigravettian is pointless. They both shattered into several cultures with varying ancestry compositions and during the Mesolithic any semblance of a pan-European language would have been lost. Any interaction between these two groups was done locally at several sites such as Southern Scandinavia, the Baltics, Ukraine, Romania and the Balkans. There is no reason to believe that they all spoke the same language. EHG are predominantly ANE on top of this which diverged from the precursors of WHG during the Middle Upper Paleolithic at the latest and spent a long time isolated from other West Eurasians.
I was wondering if somebody didn't pay the light bill over there...
I didn't even get a chance to check out that forum before it vanished. Oh well.
Btw, so Trump won. Go and buy gold or something. A market crash is on the way when he shuts down the US government next year.
I've been told by the admin of Genarchivist that the site is having a DNS issue but will be back up once he gets it sorted out.
And yeah, we're living in Trumpistan again. On behalf of America I apologize for my countrymen's stupidity. I hope our institutions can survive another round of this buffoon's demagoguery.
@Michalis Moriopoulos
There is no point to apologize.
The people of America have spoken.
The data from the Picenes IA is now on ENA.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB77116
I wonder how much economic expertise a cackling hyena addicted to fentanyl has
@Rob I suppose you mean Kamala Harris? Your insult isn't very well founded, and it reminds me of the Russian propaganda against Zelensky. Truth be told, Kamala Harris doesn't have much better economic expertise than Trump. The problem lies in the idea that Trump has some particularly good economic expertise, just because he's a successful business man who got rich with real estate (and because he's a Republican). But these are two very different subjects, also at universities. On the one hand there is business administration/industrial management/industrial economics/business economics, this is what Trump may have some expertise in. On the other hand there is economics/macroeconomics/political economics/political economy, of which Trump has zero understanding. Take for instance his ridiculous claim that he made China pay billions of punitive tariffs. No way these tariffs were paid by China. Think about it, it's a childish claim of an amateur. So the idea that Trump is good at economics is just a myth, an urban legend.
I think that Trump is both more charismatic and more competent than Harris.
@Ariel
Interesting paper; there is some uncertainty about the ethnic affiliation of Novilara. In ancient Greek and Roman geography the Picenes, or more properly called the Picentes, lived only south of the Esino. To the North of that river were the Umbri, and then the Gaulish Senones. Likewise inscriptions in South Picene language are only known from south of that river. But archaeologically it was all part of the Middle Adriatic culture in the early Iron Age. Maybe the Umbri started to expand to the Adria only in the 7th century BC. There is the famous Novilara stele, written in an undeciphered strange language labelled as "North Picene", which I suspect to be a hoax. Anthropologically the people from Novilara had on average strikingly long, narrow and high crania, with long, narrow faces.
I have no idea what Trump is competent at, except maybe going bankrupt and conning stupid people.
I have no problem with that conman getting elected again, because it was a democratic election. But it'll be funny to watch most of the idiots who voted for him suffering as a result.
@Simon W
Why do you continue to hate a part of you? Celt Senones went extinct, because nothing was found of them in that territory, and there is someone who thinks that the language of the Novilara Stele is an old form of Celtic language. I read a paper of a Dutch linguist many years ago. Is it a hoax? But we have the aDNA now. Speak about that, please, and if you hate your Italian part you can cut it off.
in any case, let's be happy for Trump, because it will save the lives of cats and dogs in Springfield
I don’t care about the pros & cons of Trumps tariff reforms. I don’t think anybody here is qualified to comment, there’s quite a bit of projection and virtue signalling going on. I’m not American , but I’d have a beer with a Texan any day over some pretentious / hysterical urbanite from NY or Oregan.
@ SimonW: I’d consider myself a neo-socialist to a degree but the US Democrats are nothing of the sort. It’s just funny seeing pretentious virtue signallers still living in their bubble of self-absorption . They don’t see the world for what it is
Massive tariffs are just the tip of the iceberg with these clowns.
They actually have plans to devalue the US dollar and even to replace it with crypto as the global reserve currency. They're also isolationists, Christian fundamentalists, and Russian assets.
The Democrats are just annoying, mainly because of their fixation with woke culture, but these MAGA Republicans are a real danger to western civilization.
Chinese-Russian partnership is the biggest failure of American foreign policy in the 21st century.
If America played its cards smart, the Chinese-Russian border would be a minefield of American military bases by now in 2024.
America did have these cards, but blew them during Clinton and Bush Jr era.
Trump is projected to finish 2024 election with 78 million votes. This is more than 74 million votes he got in 2020 and far more than 63 million votes he got in 2016.
IMO this upward trend shows that people who elected him for 2017-2021 did not suffer under his first term and don't regret their decision.
People did suffer as a result of Trump's first term as president. But many of them later blamed this on Biden, because Biden was left to fix Trump's mistakes.
So the problem is that many voters didn't understand cause and effect in this context.
We'll see this cycle repeated again, but everything suggests that Trump will be a lot worse this time, because he's now totally surrounded by a bunch of clowns like him.
Trump tariffs aren't supposed to be good for customer prices. Their intention is to hurt the Chinese exports and as a result the Chinese economy as a whole.
Main root of post-2022 inflation in the US revolves around the Russo-Ukrainian war. If you support Ukraine then you wouldn't blame Biden for it. I don't support Ukraine and I can see how Biden's foreign policy during his first year in office in 2021 has led to it.
My personal take is that Biden or Harris would've been reelected in 2024 if:
1). He didn't supply Ukraine with weapons throughout 2021;
2). He didn't speedrun accession to NATO talks with Ukraine in 2021;
3). Russia didn't invade Ukraine in 2022, global commodity market and customer inflation in the US remained stable.
You sound mentally retarded.
Inflation in the US was caused by Covid, post-Covid price gouging and high oil prices.
Ukraine has nothing to do with inflation in the US. Ukraine is just defending itself from Russia and I support Ukraine.
Also, tariffs will tank the US economy before they destroy China.
And they will cause massive inflation. So the people who voted for Trump to lower inflation are clowns.
Like I said, you sound mentally retarded.
Russo-Ukrainian war has a tremendous impact on the price of oil and other commodities.
I agree with one thing you said: Ukraine is defending itself from Russia. But I don't support Ukraine.
You're not making any sense. You just make stuff up as you go.
Oil prices are currently relatively low despite Russia continuing to wage war on Ukraine.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine was one of the factors that caused a spike in oil prices, but it didn't have a long term impact.
https://www.macrotrends.net/2516/wti-crude-oil-prices-10-year-daily-chart
Here's a study on the impact of the Russo-Ukrainian war on the oil market. It was published in January 2024 long after the initial price spike has passed.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02526-9
Quote of one of the paragraphs:
"Consequently, the study demonstrates that the Russia–Ukraine war has significantly impacted the crude oil market, fundamentally altering its long-term trend in oil prices."
Oil would be significantly cheaper throughout 2022, 2023 and 2024 if Russia didn't invade Ukraine.
Except that both the price of oil and inflation in the US are now unexpectedly low (largely thanks to Biden).
However, they are likely to rise significantly thanks to Trump getting elected (and not because Ukraine is continuing to defend itself).
So again, you're not making any sense and you actually do sound like you're mentally retarded.
The study I quoted has been published almost two years after the war started when the oil price has already contracted to the pre-war level and below.
The study does conclude, however, that the oil market is still under a significant impact of the Russo-Ukrainian war, and that it prevents the oil price from contracting even further.
As I said, the Russian invasion of Ukraine did cost Biden/Harris their re-election. Without it the US would've had less inflation throughout Biden's presidency and the oil price would've been lower, enough to tip the scale in Biden/Harris favor.
Covid is the main reason for inflation in recent years.
It's pure speculation that if not for Russia's invasion of Ukraine low oil prices would tip the balance in favor of Harris.
Oil prices and inflation were low in the run up to the election, and in fact one of the main reasons that Harris lost was confusion about many issues, including inflation.
Who'd knew that Donald Trump being re-elected would revive the Eurogenes comment section? No complaints here
@Copper Axei think David should create two new posts. one on the interpretation of the data on the origins of indoeuropeans and the bronze age of the caucasus, and the second on the politics of trump's reelection. is this a good or bad thing?
@Davidski
Why haven't you made any posts in so long? Have you given up on Eurogenes?
Well, at least one post at first, we've been waiting for it for a long time
He is either busy with personal affairs or cooking something big for genetics.
If he dropped this blog you wouldn't see that recent debate about Trump.
I think it's a bad idea to have a political discussion on a genealogic forum, it has some bad vibes from history. Just let me tell the MAGA fascists that USA will now have the only illiterate President of all the 195 countries. It should tell you something.
Trump's reforms won't do jack. He's just trying to slow the inevitable of what's coming from a $35 trillion debt and rejection of US dollar. China is now trading in US debt for gold. Brutal
@SimonW
How's your Zio-Boomer propaganda going ? It has taken us to the precipice of oblivion, and yet here you are stil clapping like a lobotomized seal
@ Davidski
Genearchivist is back. But it it's essentially full of haplo-tards and and Gabru (or whatever it call's itself now) stinking it out the PIE thread with bullshit & ignorance
The Slav thread is also disappointingly mediocre
I think Trump is the type of politician that the US needs at the moment, since dictatorial, irreplaceable authorities in the eyes of the world community (I mean ordinary people, a flock of sheep that need a strict shepherd) began to look strong and powerful, and many already take democracy for weakness, softness, compliance, plus Biden looked very weak and confused, and Trump looks like he is ready to rein in all these unbridled dictators. My opinion
@ Davidski: What is your view on Zhur et al: Zhur, K.V. & Sharko, F.S. & Leonova, M.V. & Mey, A. & Prokhortchouk, E.B. & Trifonov, V.A. "Human DNA from the oldest Eneolithic cemetery in Nalchik points the spread of farming from the Caucasus to the Eastern European steppes." in "iScience" issue 27 (Maryland Heights, USA: Elsevier Inc., 2024)?
make a model of the Bronze Age Hadji Firuz, it feels like he's a bit early CWC, in addition to the Pit
Those newly published samples from the Caucasus region look like various combinations of Yamnaya, Iran_N/CHG, Anatolian Neolithics and EHG.
Basically all the sort of stuff that we already knew was present in that area in Eneolithic and the Bronze Age.
from the latest work of Galichi, samples of the middle bronze of Ginchi were obtained as a mixture of Kura Arax Belkaber and Catacomb
Highland_MBA_east ARM_Berkaber_KuraAraxes_EBA;Catacomb 0 0.10463477 4.48E-07 0.884 0.116 0.027 0.027
Rob modeled the sample GIN006 as a mixture of Aknashen and Yamnaya of the Caucasus
l
eft pops:
GIN006
Armenia_Aknashen_N
Russia_Caucasus_EBA_Yamnaya
best coefficients: 0.878 0.122
but in my g25 this sample does not need either Yamnaya or Afanasyeva or Catacomb, all this is in the sources but nevertheless he chooses Kotias + Areni + Shekh gebi
Target: Russia_Dagestan_Ginchi_MLBA:GIN006__BC_2163__Cov_24.05%
Distance: 2.8909% / 0.02890949 | R4P
39.4 Georgia_Kotias.SG
28.6 Armenia_C_Areni
28.4 Iran_C_SehGabi
3.6 Turkey_Kumtepe_N_lc.SG
and that's enough for him
which model is more reliable?
I think mine
@Davidski
Trump only ever lists tariffs in his platform with regards to balancing the trade deficit and punishing foreign countries who put large tariffs on the united states (encouraging a more mutually beneficial trade agreement)
If you were an American, you might support Trump, in spite of perceived flaws. But it is in your best interest as a Polish person to support politicians who put America second and continue the World Police schtick
@WHS
Just like a typical Trump supporter, you're living in a fantasy world shaped by Russian propaganda.
The easiest and cheapest way to stop Russia and avoid a major global conflict is for America to support countries like Ukraine and Poland. This should be obvious to anyone with a brain.
If Russia rolls over Ukraine, and moves against Poland and other countries in the region, things will get a lot more dangerous and expensive for you.
I won't get into Trump's economic plans here. I'll just let you experience them yourself, because you're about to get a lot poorer after voting for that clown.
There are some Republicans who are openly saying that the US will be better off if they divide Russia & China from each other and establish an anti-Chinese Russo-American alliance.
Trump is not saying the quiet part loud, but he is also thinking in that direction.
It's a nightmare scenario for countries which have historical grievances with Russia, but American POV is slightly different.
Haha.
Russia is actually at war with America and has been for years. There won't be a Russo-American alliance in our lifetime.
If Russia can finish destroying the US with propaganda from the inside, then it will do so.
Apart from that, China is watching carefully what is happening in Ukraine, and it'll go on the attack if the west shows it's too weak to contain Russia.
These issues are closely related. You can't contain China by ignoring what happens in Europe.
There won't be an anti-Chinese alliance indeed.
Some traditional/mainstream candidate (no matter Democrat or Republican) will win in 2028 and will continue the foreign policy of Joe Biden.
Russians understand this, and they won't be cutting their ties with China for 4 years of Trump.
Russia is a fascist state, so it's not a matter of them understanding anything.
Russia will just keep causing trouble until it destroys itself. That's the natural order of things for a fascist state.
I wonder why there are so many putin and russia fans in Western countries? What are you trying to achieve until all of Europe becomes russia? So that you can be ruled by an irreplaceable dictator who would feed you promises every year, and turn all of Europe into a garbage dump, erase your history, culture, language, and make ruZZians out of you? Is this a new level of sadomasochism for Europeans? Why bother with trifles? You will choose Kim as your ruler.
David, I can't understand what's going on with these Europeans. On YouTube, all the videos I come across are about russia hitting Ukraine with a ballistic missile (which is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead), putin's new dick, which he waves at the West. There, the Europeans in English-language comments are practically giving birth with joy. And these aren't some kind of bots, these are real people. Have you all gone crazy with this left-wing liberal democracy?
Marlene Laruelle, a French political scientist, contends that the accusation of "fascist" has evolved into a strategic narrative of the existing world order. Geopolitical rivals might construct their own view of the world and assert the moral high ground by branding ideological rivals as fascists, regardless of their real ideals or deeds.
Oxford historian Roger Griffin compared Putin's Russia to the World War II-era Empire of Japan, saying that like Putin's Russia, it "emulated fascism in many ways, but was not fascist.".
According to Marlene Laurelle writing in The Washington Quarterly, "applying the "fascism" label to the entirety of the Russian state or society short-circuits our ability to construct a more complex and differentiated picture.".
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, collecting the opinions of experts on fascism, said that while Russia is repressive and authoritarian, it cannot be classified as a fascist state for various reasons, including Russia's government being more reactionary than revolutionary.
@mister funk
Your parents Mr Dunning and Mrs Kruger are looking for you.
maybe I'm exaggerating, but it works (propaganda).
When I see positive comments and approval of English-speaking commentators to Russia's aggressive actions, I'm ready to smash my phone against the wall😮💨
Mitanni Aryan
Target: Iran_Hasanlu_IA_o:I4097__BC_1354__Cov_86.75%
Distance: 1.3246% / 0.01324647
70.2 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
15.2 Iran_DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_1
14.6 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
J1-PF4816 and R2+13500 y and mtdna
Post Mitanni Hasanlu....
Target: Iran_Hasanlu_IA
Distance: 0.4599% / 0.00459926
52.0 Iran_DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_1
26.6 Iran_Hasanlu_IA_o
21.4 Armenia_Lchashen_LBA
Another model that bypass sintashta
Target: Iran_Hasanlu_IA_o:I4097__BC_1354__Cov_86.75%
Distance: 1.2288% / 0.01228836
59.4 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
23.4 Armenia_Lchashen_LBA
13.4 Iran_DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_1
3.8 Kazakhstan_Kumsay_EBA
Leave it to qpadm experts to verify...
@Ash
It's impossible to bypass Sintashta-related ancestry when dealing with South Asia because of the massive impact that Sintashta-related people had on the Y-chromosome gene pool of South Asia.
The Z93 in South Asia is from Sintashta-related groups that penetrated South Asia via Central Asia.
Everyone with a brain should know this.
left pops:
GIN006
Armenia_C
Iran_C_SehGabi
Georgia_Kotias.SG
best coefficients: 0.316 0.393 0.291
tail prob 0.450661
right pops:
Mbuti.DG
Ethiopia_4500BP
Russia_Kostenki14
China_Tianyuan
Georgia_Satsurblia.SG
Mongolia_North_N
Russia_AfontovaGora3
Pinarbasi
Luxembourg_Loschbour
Serbia_IronGates_Mesolithic
Russia_Karelia_HG
Jordan_PPNB
Turkey_N
Turkey_TellKurdu_EC
Jordan_Late_PPNB
Russia_Sidelkino_HG.SG
Tutkaul1
Turkey_TepecikCiftlik_N.SG
this model shows that the early ginchis do just fine without the catacomb, and in the role of the "steppe" source can easily be performed by areni or sarazm, since it has a displacement tutkaul
I posted about Mitanni Aryans not south Asians...
Anyway this sample...is R1a-z93
Target: Pakistan_Butkara_IA:I12450__BC_801__Cov_50.77%
Distance: 2.0862% / 0.02086153
48.4 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
37.8 Iran_ShahrISokhta_BA2
5.4 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
5.2 TibetanPlateau_Zongri
3.2 Kazakhstan_Dali_EBA
Early Aryans were most likely BMAC heavy folks...
by the way, this Labazy Mesolithic (~ 6300 BC , Y-Q1b1) looks like an ideal source in the role of EHG for populations of the steppe Eneolithic , Krinitsa, Khvalynsk, Yekaterinovka, it is better than Samara HG and Karelia HG
it is somewhat similar to sidelkino, but additionally mixed with TTK
Individual (outier) I4097, Hasanlu, Iran, cannot be from Iron Age due to it's dated c. 1425-1284 cal BCE (1354 BCE). It can be a Late Bronze Age sample if it's Mitanni-related, but of course too east to be in Mitanni territory itself.
I6735 30 (Khvalynsk-2, burial 26)
5206-4935 calBCE pre-J1-Z1828
https://i.ibb.co/q1XWrjj/Khval-J1.png
Target: Russia_Khvalynsk_Eneolithic_med:I6735
Distance: 3.0301% / 0.03030082
67.2 EHG
18.4 Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic
9.8 Tajikistan_Mesolithic
4.6 Armenia_Aknashen_N
or else
Target: Russia_Khvalynsk_Eneolithic_med:I6735
Distance: 2.5230% / 0.02522983
73.8 Russia_Labazy_Mesolithic
16.2 Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic
7.0 Armenia_Aknashen_N
3.0 Tajikistan_Mesolithic
(eats a little chg and tutkaul, but is better suited for Volga Klin)
@ Mister Funk
That model ^ which I did just shows the limitations of admixture modelling or the need to be interpreted and compared against several others. Obviously something about that mix makes it pass, but it doesn’t automatically mean it makes historical sense.
So, Areni C is an extinct population which got wiped out by the KAx expansion. GIN 6 dates to 2200bc, which is when Catacomb/KMK was expanding across the Caucasus .
@Rob
yes, I forgot to mention that you ran this model, but it is quite possible that this Ginchin 6 did not have a mixture with the catacomb culture, and it appeared a little later in these parts, and not directly, but already as a mixture (like the mixture that was at that time in the Archon of Ingushetia, or in the foothills of Emba, Akushinsky district), and this whole steppe pedigree can be from the Eneolithic, yes, these catacomb people were very mobile, but on the other hand, the Shamil region is a rather isolated place, the burial ground itself is on the side of a mountain, and, probably, at that time they did not mix with anyone.
Mitanni were non-indo Europeans who had contacts with Indo European population some of whom did reach west as far as Alalakh...
Target: Turkey_Hatay_Alalakh_MLBA_o:ALA019__BC_1564__Cov_63.81%
Distance: 1.8282% / 0.01828225
91.2 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
8.8 Kazakhstan_Kumsay_EBA
Target: Iran_DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_2
Distance: 0.4874% / 0.00487393
42.0 Iran_DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_1
36.4 Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_1
15.8 Armenia_Lchashen_LBA
3.4 Kazakhstan_Kumsay_EBA
2.4 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_1 perhaps was Akkadian/Assyrian related...
Hurro-Urartian were from Armenia and we know BMAC had Fire and Soma cult and even the hard-core kurganists consider Indra to be a BMAC deity...so this BMAC intrusion is definitely bringing Indo Iranian flavor to the region.
G25 distance of these 2 groups
Distance to: Turkey_Hatay_Alalakh_MLBA_o:ALA019__BC_1564__Cov_63.81%
0.06233634 Balochi_Pakistan
0.06443584 Brahui
0.06566911 Balochi_Iran
0.06580624 Balochi_Iran_o
0.06964782 Makrani
0.07192845 Pashtun_Afghanistan
0.07348931 Pashtun_Pakistan_Bettani
0.07470908 Pashtun_Afghanistan_Paktia
0.07581954 Sindhi_o
0.07810211 Iranian_Bandari
0.07882484 Iranian_Persian_Khorasan
0.08201613 Pashtun_Afghanistan_North
0.08296237 Kalash
0.08477164 Pashtun_Tarkalani
0.08620560 Iranian_Mazandarani
0.08633477 Pashtun_Pakistan_Khattak_Nowshera
0.08708693 Parsi_Pakistan
0.08763512 Pashtun_Afghanistan_Northeast
0.08795125 Parsi_India
0.08812366 Pashtun_Uthmankhel
0.08846959 Iranian_Mazandarani_o
0.09079700 Tajik_Yaghnobi
0.09172528 Pashtun_Northeast_Afghanistan
0.09213989 Pashtun_Yusufzai
0.09421037 Pamiri_Ishkashim
Distance to: Iran_DinkhaTepe_BA_IA_2
0.02119484 Iranian_Lor_Bakhtiari
0.02249764 Iranian_Lor_Khorramabad
0.02259646 Iranian_Persian_Fars
0.02374368 Iranian_Zoroastrian
0.02411180 Iranian_Mazandarani
0.02424266 Iranian_Cosmopolitan_Tehran
0.02692336 Talysh_Azerbaijan
0.02729137 Kurd_USSR
0.02767198 Iranian_Persian_Yazd
0.02936577 Irani_Zoroastrian_India
0.02938616 Ezid
0.02948530 Kurd_Sorani_Iran_Mukriyan
0.02949013 Kurd_Iraq
0.03010232 Iranian_Central
0.03086788 Iranian_Mazandarani_o
0.03093681 Iranian_Persian_Shiraz
0.03162183 Kurd_Kurmanji_Turkey
0.03206166 Kurd_Zaza_Turkey
0.03276160 Alevi_Dersim
0.03366606 Kurd_Syria
0.04038594 Tat_Azerbaijan
0.04143780 Azerbaijani_Republic_Gabala
0.04328245 Azerbaijani_Republic_Shaki
0.04383306 Bukharian_Jew
0.04441046 Udi
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.02.626332v1.supplementary-material
I-L699 in MBA Kaman-Kalehoyuk.
Missed that Kulluoba (NW Turkey) is also I-L699.
@ Ethan
Damn; that's a slam dunk.
@ MF
If Ginchi is in a secluded place, how would (extinct) Armenia_C ancestry get there whilst the expanding Catacomb ancestry missed it ?
@Rob
yes, it's a good question, but for this you need to know the HG of the Mesolithic and Neolithic of this region. Then you need to know the Eneolithic Ginchi. After all, the Eneolithic Ginchi belongs to the Sion-Tsopi Ginchi archaeological complex. Which means that there could be literally anything in the mixture. just need more ancient DNA.
Additionally, there is genetic evidence of long-distance interaction 376 with Northern Europe, as seen in a Scandinavian genetic outlier (CGG_2_022535) from a 377 rock-cut tomb at Vounous Bellapais, excavated by the Swedish-Cyprus expedition and dated 378 to c. 4,000–3,800 BP. (Genetics and Strontium Supplementary Fig. S6.45, Archaeology 379 Supplementary 2.2.7). This outlier clusters with Scandinavian Bronze Age individuals and, 380 intriguingly, this origin is also supported by the Y-haplogroup I1 and by a non-local highly 381 radiogenic strontium isotope signature compatible with some parts of Scandinavia (Genetics 382 and Strontium Supplementary S10; Supplementary Table S8). The implications of this 383 observation are not conclusive, since we do not have radiocarbon dating from this individual.
lol, were the nazi archeologists right after all? Scandinavians in BA Cyprus.
In theory, could be some rogue Scando metal trader or mercenary, but I doubt it.
No C14 dating. Unusual results should be double dated.
Given the absence of BA Scandinavian ancestry and I1 in Myceneans and later Greeks it's certainly not of significance to Greeks, but an impressive trek for this guy. However what is funny is that it is dated to the same period as the two R1b-Z2103 they take as evidence that Yamnaya was the vector for the Greek language, those are in my opinion equally insignificant. According to the paper the proto Greeks were living in Hungary or something from the end of the Yamnaya period in 2500 B.C., for 800 years? where they lived unadmixed with any Corded Ware or Beakers? until they decided to bring Greek to the Aegean in 1700 B.C.? It's nonsense. The Harvard theory is a total mess now.
It is kind of incredible to reflect on. Two years after the Southern Arc fiasco we get three papers which on their own work to support a chronologically, archeologically, and genetically robust framework connecting the Lower Volga, Sredni Stog, Cernavoda I, and now Kulluoba (proto-hittite) and Central Anatolia.
That's without mentioning the contributions of the historical linguistics community, which has almost always been consistent with the above, and I suspect, based on several outcoming papers, this will only continue to be the case.
@Romulus the I2a L233,
They found 2 BA cypriots who plot like BA Scandinavians. That truly comes as a remarkable surprise.
"Cyprus
To model individuals from Cyprus, we used East_Set6 and Yamnaya (East_steppe_Set1; Supplementary Table S4) and CWC (East_steppe_Set3; Supplementary Table S4). The model with Iran and Caucasus populations revealed that the earliest individual from Cyprus dated to 4,300 BP showed farmer ancestry while the rest of the individuals showed multiple population structures. One group is similar to Anatolia and Levant Bronze Age populations (Tepecik+Caucasus/Iran), while the second group shows the same pattern with Western Anatolian Iron Age individuals (Tepecik+Caucasus+Barçın+Yamnaya), and a few individuals carry a higher proportion of Ukraine Meso/Neolithic, which indicates steppe-related ancestry potentially from Europe (Fig. S6.45). When we added two steppe sources, Yamnaya and CWC respectively, this variation became clearer, showing two steppe outliers (CGG_2_022534; CGG_2_022535) carrying CWC ancestry (Fig. S6.45; Supplementary Table S5). These individuals are also clustered with Scandinavian Bronze Age individuals. Another group shows the Aegean/Balkan signature by showing a mixed pattern of both steppe sources, and the other group resembles Eastern Anatolian/Levantine Bronze Age, showing increased Iran ancestry. Among two outliers with the highest steppe proportion, we cautiously report that one of them (CGG_2_022534) has no reliable context information, and might be from somewhere else. The other one has no direct carbon dating (Archaeology Supplementary 2.2). Interestingly, the Bronze Age individuals from Hala Sultan Tekke show three different admixture patterns; similar to Balkan/Greece, Anatolia Bronze Age, and Lebanon Bronze Age (Fig. S6.42). Further, we investigated Anatolian contribution to Cyprus and Levant Bronze/Iron Age by applying Anatolia Chalcolithic/Bronze sources populations (Fig. S6.46; S6.47). The model with Arslantepe individuals completely modelled Levant populations except the Iron Age and later period individuals who received steppe proportion (Fig. S6.47; Supplementary Table S5). The model with Central and Western Anatolian Chalcolithic/Bronze modelled Cyprus Bronze Age individuals better than Arslantepe and Çamlibel sources (Fig. S6.46; Supplementary Table S5). The individuals with steppe ancestry modelled both with Yamnaya and Bell Beaker. Whereas two Scandinavian outliers are modelled with Bell Beaker, the rest are modelled with Yamnaya, similarly Greece Bronze Age individuals (Fig. S6.46; Supplementary Table S5)."
I still don't understand how the Southern Arc paper made it through the David Reich Lab as a manuscript, let alone through the peer review process at Science.
The one thing that I'd really like to do is to take it apart piece by piece in a more formal setting, like at least in a preprint at bioRxiv, and properly humiliate the authors. They deserve it.
Could we get a new thread perhaps? It is a drag having to load over 1k comments to read the latest. The new preprint has some fascinating samples so I think thats a good topic to discuss.
The scandinavians in Cyprus, prior to the presence of Greeks and slightly before the Nordic Bronze Age and Mycenae, are very interesting. I dont think they were misdated or contaminated, everything else seems to check out. With the prevalence of I-L699 in the western black sea region during the eneolithic, these new samples weaken the proposal by Laziris&Reich in their latest pre-prints. Funny how Copenhagen is the lab which have opposed their IE theories and they find I-L699 in bronze age Anatolia. Interesting times!
Post a Comment