TUR_Kumtepe_N_kum4 RUS_Progress_En 0.383±0.114 TUR_Barcin_N 0.617±0.114 chisq 7.868 tail prob 0.247957 Full output TUR_Kumtepe_N_kum4 IRN_Seh_Gabi_C 0.325±0.150 TUR_Barcin_N 0.675±0.150 chisq 14.736 tail prob 0.0224096 Full output TUR_Kumtepe_N_kum6 RUS_Progress_En 0.121±0.042 TUR_Barcin_N 0.879±0.042 chisq 21.790 tail prob 0.00132149 Full output TUR_Kumtepe_N_kum6 IRN_Seh_Gabi_C 0.283±0.059 TUR_Barcin_N 0.717±0.059 chisq 6.289 tail prob 0.391566 Full outputIndeed, kum4 and kum6 offer just ~10,000 and ~100,000 "valid SNPs", respectively (see here). However, if nothing else, the results are clearly not random. For one, because they fit the expected pattern, with the likely older individual lacking ancestry from the PC steppe (her model with RUS_Progress_En shows a weak statistical fit). Moreover, the qpAdm mixture ratios align almost perfectly with the results in my Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of ancient West Eurasian genetic variation. Coincidence? See also... Perhaps a hint of things to come
search this blog
Showing posts with label homeland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homeland. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
The precursor of the Trojans
Who remembers kum4 from Omrak et al. 2016? I'm pretty sure now that this individual packs a lot of ancestry from the Pontic-Caspian (PC) steppe.
If so, that's a big deal, because her Chalcolithic (or Late Neolithic?) burial was located at Kumtepe. That is, in the same part of Anatolia as the later settlement of Troy, which may have been founded by early Anatolian speakers from Eastern Europe (see here).
The qpAdm mixture models below, featuring kum4 and the likely older kum6, also from Kumtepe, are based on qpfstats output. qpfstats is a new program from the David Reich Lab specifically designed to help analyze low coverage ancients (see here). And kum4 is certainly that.
Tuesday, June 2, 2020
Perhaps a hint of things to come
It's still a mystery how the Hittites and other Anatolian speakers ended up in the Near East. However, the leading theory is that their ancestors migrated from the steppes of Eastern Europe to western Anatolia via the Balkans sometime during the Copper Age.
Consider the qpAdm mixture models below, made possible thanks to some of the ancient samples published recently along with Skourtanioti et al. 2020. The key ancients are described in a text file available here.
TUR_Barcin_C AZE_Caucasus_lowlands_LN 0.471±0.094 RUS_Vonyuchka_En 0.148±0.040 TUR_Barcin_N 0.381±0.069 chisq 12.874 tail prob 0.116261 Full output TUR_Barcin_C RUS_Vonyuchka_En 0.107±0.029 TUR_Buyukkaya_EC 0.893±0.029 chisq 12.107 tail prob 0.207331 Full outputI'd say it's quite clear now that TUR_Barcin_C harbors minor ancestry from the Pontic-Caspian (PC) steppe. The reason this isn't widely accepted yet is because demonstrating it convincingly hasn't been possible without a proximate Anatolian ancestry source for TUR_Barcin_C, precisely like TUR_Buyukkaya_EC. Admittedly, though, the statistical fits in my models aren't all that great. I suspect the problem lies with RUS_Vonyuchka_En, which is likely to be a rather poor stand in for the people who brought steppe ancestry, and possibly early Anatolian speech, to western Anatolia. So let's see what happens when I try a more proximate reference for the steppe ancestry in TUR_Barcin_C. How about Yamnaya_BGR, an individual of mixed Balkan and steppe origin from what is now Bulgaria?
TUR_Barcin_C AZE_Caucasus_lowlands_LN 0.518±0.075 TUR_Barcin_N 0.203±0.056 Yamnaya_BGR 0.279±0.067 chisq 10.602 tail prob 0.225269 Full output TUR_Barcin_C TUR_Buyukkaya_EC 0.749±0.058 Yamnaya_BGR 0.251±0.058 chisq 9.687 tail prob 0.376414 Full outputThat's a little better. Unfortunately, the problem now is that the models are anachronistic, because TUR_Barcin_C is about a thousand years older than Yamnaya_BGR. Clearly, we need more Copper Age samples from the western edge of the PC steppe, the eastern Balkans, and especially northwestern Anatolia. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) below effectively illustrates why my qpAdm models work. It was produced with Global25 data using the Vahaduo PCA tools freely available here. Note that TUR_Barcin_C is shifted away from the essentially perfect cline formed by AZE_Caucasus_lowlands_LN, TUR_Barcin_N and TUR_Buyukkaya_EC towards samples from ancient Eastern Europe, including Yamnaya_BGR. See also... Steppe invaders in the Bronze Age Balkans
Labels:
Anatolia,
Anatolian,
ancient DNA,
Balkans,
Black Sea,
Hittite,
Hittites,
homeland,
Luwian,
Luwians,
North Pontic,
PIE,
Pontic-Caspian steppe,
Proto-Indo-European,
Usatovo culture,
Yamnaya
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)