The weaponry of the pastoral societies in the context of the weaponry of the steppe/forest-steppe communities: 5000-2350 BCSee also...
search this blog
Showing posts with label Catacomb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catacomb. Show all posts
Saturday, October 26, 2019
Warlike herders and their weapons
Who had the best gear? The Yamnaya guys? And if it came down to it, who would've won an all out rumble? Let me know your thoughts after reading this paper...
Labels:
archeology,
axe,
battle,
Catacomb,
Corded Ware Culture,
Cucuteni-Trypilla,
dagger,
Eastern Europe,
Indo-European,
Pontic-Caspian steppe,
Usatovo culture,
Usatovo daggers,
warlike,
weaponry,
weapons,
Yamnaya
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Catacomb > Armenia_MLBA
It's now clear, thanks to ancient DNA, that Transcaucasia and surrounds were affected by multiple, and at times significant, population movements from Eastern Europe during the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age periods. Based on the ancient samples from what is now Armenia, I'd say that this process peaked during the Middle Bronze Age. But who exactly were the people who perhaps swarmed south of the Caucasus at this time?
The most likely suspects are the various groups that occupied the southernmost parts of the Pontic-Caspian steppe throughout the Bronze Age. They were associated with the so called Catacomb, Kubano-Tersk and Yamnaya archeological cultures. Below is a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) that compares samples from these cultures with those from Middle to Late Bronze Age Armenia (labeled Armenia_MLBA). The relevant datasheet is available here.
Note that Armenia_MLBA forms a cline that appears to be stretching out towards the Catacomb, Kubano-Tersk, Yamnaya and other Bronze Age steppe groups, and this suggests that it harbors significant and probably recent steppe-related ancestry. But PCA plots based on just two dimensions of genetic variation can be misleading at times, so let's check this out with some formal mixture models using qpAdm.
Armenia_MLBA Catacomb 0.234±0.028 Kura-Araxes_Kaps 0.766±0.028 chisq 10.723 tail prob 0.826248 Full output Armenia_MLBA Kubano-Tersk 0.254±0.030 Kura-Araxes_Kaps 0.746±0.030 chisq 13.535 tail prob 0.633284 Full output Armenia_MLBA Kura-Araxes_Kaps 0.768±0.028 Yamnaya_Kalmykia 0.232±0.028 chisq 14.454 tail prob 0.564954 Full output Armenia_MLBA Kura-Araxes_Kaps 0.762±0.029 Yamnaya_Caucasus 0.238±0.029 chisq 15.916 tail prob 0.458816 Full outputAll of these models are statistically very sound, and even though I ranked the results by "tail prob", there's nothing in the output that clearly points to any one of the southern steppe groups as the obvious source of the steppe-related ancestry in Armenia_MLBA. But, interestingly, Catacomb tops the ranking, and it probably also makes the most sense based simply on Carbon-14 chronology. So, for now, I'm going with Catacomb. I didn't get a chance yet to investigate this issue in detail with the Global25. Does it contradict the results from my PCA and qpAdm analyses? If anyone reading this would like to take a close look that'd be great. Feel free to post your findings in the comments below. And if the answer is indeed Catacomb, then what language did these Catacomb-derived migrants, or perhaps invaders, speak? If not proto-Armenian then what? By the way, please be aware that the Kubano-Tersk samples in my analyses are the same individuals as those featured in Wang et al. 2019 under the label "North Caucasus". See also... Early chariot drivers of Transcaucasia came from... Likely Yamnaya incursion(s) into Northwestern Iran Late PIE ground zero now obvious; location of PIE homeland still uncertain, but...
Labels:
Anatolia,
ancient DNA,
Armenia,
Bronze Age,
Catacomb,
Caucasus,
Eastern Europe,
Greco-Armenian,
Hittites,
Indo-European,
Kubano-Tersk,
Pontic-Caspian steppe,
Transcaucasia,
Yamna,
Yamnaya
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)