search this blog

Saturday, July 18, 2026

The genetic history of Rus (Andreeva et al. 2025 preprint)


Over at bioRxiv at this LINK. As far as I can see, this is the most interesting preprint published in the last 12 months. At the same time, however, the authors could've done a much better job with the fine scale analysis of their samples. For instance, they rely solely on a West Eurasian-level Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to study intra-Northern European diversity. Hopefully, the paper will be better. Abstract:

The foundation of the first ancient Rus’ state occurred as a result of the consolidation of diverse communities inhabiting Eastern Europe during the second half of the first millennium CE. Historical sources imply that these communities mostly include East Slavs, whose settlement across a vast territory led to the emergence of the East Slavic/Rus’ culture within the Rus’ state. We generated genomic data for 200 medieval individuals from different locations to elucidate the origin and genetic structure of the Rus’ population during the early stages of the state formation. Our findings reveal a genetic continuum predominantly shaped by two key genetic groups: a broad Slavic-related continuity of different genetic subclusters of Rus’ occupying the enormous European Plain area, and a Fenno-Ugrian (Uralic)-related component in the Northern Rus’ region. Importantly, both groups have a shared genetic substrate inherited from preceding ancient Baltic region populations. To scale Scandinavian ("Viking") heritage, we traced minor Scandinavian genetic lineages that did not make up the dominating genetic stratum of the early Rus’ state. Our study presents the first comprehensive genomic image of the medieval Rus’, highlighting the intricate cultural and genetic interactions between Slavic, Fenno-Ugrian, and other groups that formed the first Rus’ state affecting Europe’s history.

Andreeva et al., Genetic history of Rus’, bioRxiv, Posted December 30, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.30.695215

I don't yet have access to the dataset from this preprint, so I grabbed a bunch of already published samples from Medieval and Viking Age Russia and put them into the Vahaduo G25 North Europe PCA. Clearly, many of the Viking Age individuals have significant levels of Scandinavian ancestry, because they're shifted west/northwest on the plot relative to most other Eastern Europeans. And, obviously, this contradicts the Andreeva et al. claim that there's only minor Scandinavian admixture in the Rus population. The datasheet that I used for the PCA can be downloaded here.

See also...

They came, they saw, and they mixed

17 comments:

Davidski said...

I've started working on the Indo-European stuff, but I don't have a blog post ready yet. Those new Anatolian samples would be very useful.

EthanR said...

The Yediay paper is probably sitting to be released at the same time the Germanic and Celtic papers from the same lab are published. The Germanic paper samples were released a while ago, so hopefully it won't be long.

I don't expect the Kultepe samples i mentioned yesterday in the last thread or the IA SW Anatolian samples to be released anytime soon.

Radiosource said...

On the Russian topic

https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/1inuw01/genetic_distance_of_russians_from_various_regions/

Kaluga, Ryazan, Tver, Yaroslavl

Belarus, Belarus, Estonia, Estonia

ambron said...

In the context of this topic, I recommend the IBD Russia IA interactive map:
https://russiaia.netlify.app/

Davidski said...

@ambron

That IBD map is for Russian Iron Age samples, right? Do you have one for Russian Viking age or Medieval samples?

Rob said...

Authors present the view that there is not much Scandinavian/ Viking contribution amongst these 'Rus'. I noted only 4 x Y-hg I1, as much E-v13.
Some will debate the representativeness of 'core elite Rus', but Ive not looked into it.

MrShomuTepinski said...

Since the landmark decoding of the human genome in the early 2000s, DNA sequencing has exploded. Traditional computers have struggled to keep pace with the deluge of data and soaring processing demands, creating a bottleneck in scientists’ capacity to mine the myriad variations in DNA for biological insights—and a push for alternative solutions.

Now, one option, quantum computing, may be a step closer to helping.

Researchers say they have for the first time encoded a complete, albeit small, genome, that of the hepatitis D virus, into a quantum computer, proving in principle these weird machines could one day aid genomics research.

Learn more: https://scim.ag/3RBulZA

https://x.com/NewsfromScience/status/2078849882148770048?s=20

ambron said...

Unfortunately, I don't have such maps. All maps are available here:
https://slawomirambroziak.pl/forum/index.php?topic=5958.0
However, I'll ask the author if he can make them.

rozbójnik said...

I have a question. How can people speak so confidently about daco thracians if the thracian language is so poorly attested? How can people know if x or y group was daco-thracian in 1500 BC? Its not like more attested language groups. Italic, germanic, as examples. You can even look at the different language branches and their oldest known speakers genetically. But is archaeology enough to know exactly who was "thracian" in the bronze age?

crashdoc said...

@Daviski

Could you make G25 out of that dataset: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AcNyGtKhWs9HImyfoKQbrcRelYJMkihN/view

There are two ancient North western America that we never had G25 for from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620410114 (2017).
I've joined to that 5 samples I had forgotten from v66 and also the new Xinglong samples from https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa-human/browse/HRA019440

Thanks!

Davidski said...

Link...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w0mddGfG6C7O3gcM9kRcybi1T23q-CwE/view?usp=sharing

crashdoc said...

Thanks, much appreciated!

Rob said...

@ rozbojnik
lol you’re right. Ive observed current genosphere theories about “Daco-Thracians”, with elaborate maps, schemata of successive cultures, haplo-stories etc., are all rather fanciful. Eg Dacians emerge just after 300 BC, the Cotofeni, Vucedol, “Thracian Halstatt”, etc have almost nothing to do with them.

Rob said...

The “Halstatt-Daco-Roman” propagated by normgroids imagines continuities which don’t exist, and even mischaracterises some groups (eg Carpi) as “Geto-Dacian” when they might have been Pomeranian - Zarubincy linked

Davidski said...

@All

I updated the blog post with a quick PCA.

The already published Viking Age Russian samples have a lot of Scandinavian ancestry.

Rob said...

Looks like the data supports the views of Lunt & Pritsak rather than simplistic 'Normanist" models - namely that the Rus' ''were disparate, and often mutually antagonistic, clans of charismatic warriors and traders who formed wide-ranging networks across the North and Baltic Seas.[53][54] They were a "multi-ethnic, multilingual and non-territorial community of sea nomads and trading settlements"

ambron said...

David

The IBD maps you requested are available here:
https://slawomirambroziak.pl/forum/index.php?msg=120611
As with all Slavs, the roots of medieval Russians lie in the Trzciniec population.